Re: [rules-users] Matching consecutive events
To paraphrase Robert Z., "Time is just another four letter word" ;-)
Clocks are just integers, incremented by Chronos, or some other god.
If the god is lazy, it'll run slowly; if the god is eager, it'll be
fast. You can be your own god (and use a pseudo-clock). You can start
with the Big Bang, your birthday, or with the recording time of A
Bigger Bang. You don't even need to count ticks of your time: you can
count sheep, too. The only rule you should obey is: never go back in
time.
Cheers
Wolfgang
On 07/08/2012, jpullmann <jaroslav.pullmann(a)fit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
Wolfgang, Vincent, Edson, many thanks for your support!
A numeric comparison of the the event timestamps did the trick.
Now I am wondering, whether using simple arithmetic operators
instead of explicit (built-in) temporal operators might impact the
automatic life-cycle management and cleanup of timed events.
Are these rules treated equally and do the involved events automatically
expire (based on their temporal annotations) ?
Best regards
Jaroslav
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Matching-consecutive-events-tp4018980p4...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users