Re: [rules-users] Drools, Grails, and default packages for domain objects

Has anyone else run into issues trying to reference objects in a default package? I'm trying to use Drools with Grails and my rule which compiled nicely in a package setting has issues when faced with a default package. The error is "foo" cannot be resolved to a type I've tried putting the rule both in the default package and putting it in a named package, and neither seem to work. If I put my objects back into packages, everything is fine. Any advice?

Thanks, Robert Costello ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users