Re: [rules-users] Easy mistake... - drools operator precedence
On 18/02/2013, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think so too.
It looks like the : operator has a higher precedence then + (and
therefor >= too), which is a bit surprising indeed.
Personally, I never mix the : operator with other operators, to avoid
having to worry about the precendence.
Is it possible to use a non-boolean expression as a constraint?
-W