OK. You mean the behavior differs by versions. My above test in which both
rules fired was using Drools 5.1.1.
Questions:
1. "Since the lock and no-loop features are based on the fact handles, the
sometimes undesired interaction occurs."
Could you elaborate more on how is lock-on-active based on fact handles?
2. Is it the expected design that when I ran my above rules in Drools 5.1.1
both rules should fire? How is it related to the fact that lock-on-active is
based on fact handles?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Why-Using-from-Always...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.