Re: [rules-users] Testing for non-existance of an object in list
On 08/04/2013 10:05 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
The rule is correct, and it works with similar scenarios.There may
be
a bug, due to circumstances. Can you post a simple but complete set of
files to reproduce this?
You're perfectly right :-) The rule was correct, but as I wrote in an
earlier post, I forgot to modify() the DQAttribute fact after changing
the checkViolations collection. So the engine could not know the correct
contents of the collection.
Thanks for looking into this!
--
CU, Joe