Re: [rules-users] Slow compilation (4h) for a single rule
laune wrote
Well, I do mind the "nonsense Number()". There's no point in
discussing this if you don't post an exact image of your rule.
-W
There is a point, because the rule I've posted compiles and causes the same
problem, I've just removed redundant code to expose the problematic section.
TL
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Slow-compilation-4h-for-a-single-rule-t...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.