Re: [rules-users] Is Flow / jBPM dying on the vine?

Salaboy, the issue I have is that I want users to be able to see the process graphically, so I think that means I need one overall process (I may use a few sub-processes). Using rules however as you suggest is there a way to "pause" a process until a message (/signal) with certain criteria is inserted? I thought about using a business rule task, with a rule that would always be false (until the node should allow processing to pass through), but I could not get that working. I also saw a suggestion about adding a "Condition" to the metadata for a timer node, but that doesn't seem to be working either. Mark - thanks for the information. I'm looking at flexible processes now and will be in touch with Kris. Thanks again, -J -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-Flow-jBPM-dying-on-the-vine-tp402073... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.