Re: [rules-users] expert: usage of ruleflow-groups

Hi, First of all, thank you both for your answers. @Wolfgang: My problem is that i cannot have the different rule groups stacked. I may do as you suggested, but i'll have rules firing from other agenda-groups after the first agenda-group activations are all gone (because they go into the stack as well, right?).

execution and just fire the rules within a specific set (aka just one group). Does this make any sense?

Thank you for your support. I appreciate all the help i can get. _ miguel On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > I've been using agenda groups without any trouble for a similar problem, > doing >  setFocus( ... ); >  insert( ... );... insert( ... ); >  fireAllRules(); > repeatedly. > > You don't have to be afraid of the focus stack growing indefinitely:You > control > the "push" (setFocus()), and if an agenda group's activations are all > gone, the > group is automatically popped from the stack. > > -W > > 2010/5/4 Miguel Machado <mls.machado(a)gmail.com&gt;: > > Hi there, > > I'm having some trouble implementing the desired workflow of rule firing > > in > > an application using drools expert. I've read the thread about the > > difference between ruleflow groups and agenda groups, but it is still > > unclear to me how to achieve what i need. > > What i intend to have is the ability to fire a specific set of rules > > according to the object i'm inserting into the ksession. > > I do not want to use agenda-groups because it stacks all the agenda > > groups > > declared on the rule file (as far as i understand) and therefore it may > > fire > > activations i do not want to be fired. Instead, i want to isolate them > > completely. I tried using ruleflow groups for this, but i cannot find a > > way > > to activate a specific group programmatically, before calling > > fireAllRules(), the way i can with agenda-groups (setFocus() method). > > That being said, i'm asking for help in trying to use either one of > > ruleflow/agenda groups or even both in order to get things working the > > way i > > described. > > Thanks in advance, > > _ miguel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- "To understand what is recursion you must first understand recursion" _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users