Indeed, this thesis mentions a few features of the system I was
talking about :-)
([13])
-W
On 11/03/2013, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
There were a number of research efforts that looked at combining
procedural
and rule base programming.
This one is quite interesting:
Combining Rule-Based and Procedural Programming in the XC and XE Programming
Lanaugages
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.9.1106&rep=r...
Mark
On 11 Mar 2013, at 18:03, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 March 2013 16:19, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
> So thinking really long term here. Can we build a "java layer" that
> provide all the rule functionality we need - but fit ontop of the java
> language neatly. We'd probably need to allow "rule" keyword and have it
in
> Classes, at the method level. All class members and methods would be
> available to the rules in that class.
>
> There is this production rule system where you can write your rules
> embedded in compiling units, and alongside the legacy program units, of a
> procedural, modular, strongly type HLL, and where you use expressions in
> the language's own syntax in constraints...
>
> We've been using it ever since 1986. Rabbi Akiva was right, wasn't he ;-)
>
> -W
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users