Re: [rules-users] Evaluate rules for multiple facts of the same type within a StateuflSession

@ part was just for your remark on cumbersomeness... I'm now reading the linked whitepaper. It's not easy for me to see how your example is easier than mine solution. I acknowledge salience redistribution would be a problem, that's why I kept them separated and kept salience values meaningful only within each activation-group. At the moment, anyway, the activation-group is stopping me from evaluating rules for a bunch of facts in only one run, so I have to find a different solution (supposing that a multiple single fact activation is not efficient, something I'm not sure). I'll read the whitepaper and see if agenda-group would better fit in my case. Thank you all. :-) -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Evaluate-rules-for-multiple-facts-of-th... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.