On 11/8/11 6:59 AM, Michael Anstis wrote:
Yes, I know that :)
However, in the grand scheme of open JIRAs and (I assume) the importance
to the OP of having this fixed as soon as possible them looking themselves
might be the quickest option. Many, many other asset types stored in Guvnor
work fine - however it is obvious the screens re-load, thus refreshing the
asset object, following a save and check-in.
Whatever mechanism is in place for BPMN2 Assets is not working quite the
way it should.
It works the exact same way as any other assets in Guvnor. To Guvnor a
.bpmn2 asset is the same as a .drl, or a .dsl, etc. Could be that if using
the standalone editor servlet the user should place the generated content
inside of an iframe would allow for an automatic refresh of the iframe
content after a save operation..but again this has nothing to do with the
actual actual editor that creates the content, but with how Guvnor handles
storing of assets.
I did suggest a JIRA could be raised, but we're not likely to look at it
any time soon.
If your assumption from the beginning is that this is an issue only with
storing of bpmn2 assets should the user create a guvnor or a jbpm jira?
With kind regards,
Mike
2011/11/8 Tihomir Surdilovic <tsurdilo(a)redhat.com>
> The jBPM Web Designer does not store any assets itself, but delegates to
> Guvnor to store them, as such I think you cannot just say "go figure out
> some code which could be broken" but look at possible Guvnor issue here. A
> test scenario would be nice to have that can reproduce the issue, as well
> as trying to do this with other assets not just BPMN2 processes. I assume
> you are storing your assets embedded into your app via the standalone
> servlet, which _is_ Guvnor code ;)
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 11/8/11 6:20 AM, Michael Anstis wrote:
>
> Great.
>
> So your options are: raise a JIRA we will look at at some time, or have a
> look in the code yourself :)
>
> The problem is as I surmised; when saving the object representing the
> BPMN2 process it needs to be re-loaded\refreshed so subsequent optimistic
> lock checks succeed.
>
> On 8 November 2011 11:16, ANJALI <swathi.2426(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If i use close/re-open everything is fine
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-guvnor-issue-tp3489376p3489938.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing
listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing
listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users