[rules-users] named consequences for an or...

I was using or in a rule for example rule "or example" when $t : (Transaction(org == "us") or Transaction(acc == "111")) then insert(new Record($t, 1)); end This would work but would create 2 Record objects which we sorted out later on but now for performance reasons I don't want the second match to be evaluated if the first one matches. I saw a post about named consequences and came up with something like: when $t : Transaction(org == "us") if ($t != null) break[t1] $t1 : Transaction(acc == "111") then insert(new Record($t1, 1)); then[t1] insert(new Record($t, 1)); end This compiles but the "or" doesn't work. This is probably due to my "break". Is there a way I can do what I need? Note that the performance implication of performing the or is not apparent in this example but it is there - I have simplified this example to make it easier to talk about (and to protect the innocent) -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/named-consequences-for-an-or-tp4027775.... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.