Re: [rules-users] Drools, Grails, and default packages for domain objects

I’m using the latest as of this date, which is 5.0.0M4 Thanks! Robert Costello Lead Systems Engineer IMA Performance E3- 279A 847.286.0910 -----Original Message----- From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org ] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:59 PM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools, Grails,and default packages for domain objects Robert, What version of Drools are you using? I remember seeing something about this in the past... I will search JIRAs to see if we have any ticket open for 5.0. []s Edson 2009/1/19 Costello, Robert <rcost10(a)searshc.com&gt; Has anyone else run into issues trying to reference objects in a default package? I'm trying to use Drools with Grails and my rule which compiled nicely in a package setting has issues when faced with a default package. The error is "foo" cannot be resolved to a type I've tried putting the rule both in the default package and putting it in a named package, and neither seem to work. If I put my objects back into packages, everything is fine. Any advice? Thanks, Robert Costello _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users