Re: [rules-users] Expert versus Expert

> centralised execution could (possibly) be achieved using drools-server. > WorkingMemoryEventListeners can provide a log of facts inserted - you'd

> AgendaEventListeners can provide a log of rule activations

> Not Drools Expert. Drools server might be what you're after - but I don't

A few months ago a question was asked about the difference and the use case involving Drools Expert and Drools Guvnor. To be honest, it isn't clear for me too and as there wasn't any answer to this first question, so I'm trying to have an answer with your help :) What's clear : - Guvnor is a repository for the assets - The easiest (?) and certainly the mainly available as a tutorial solution is to create in each application an agent that grabs the assets and execute the whole thing in its own context. What's not clear : - how to centralize the execution in order to know exactly what's executed, by whom, and how (be able to log which facts are sent, to which rules, and be able to read the execution plan - if it exists a "real" stand alone centralized engine that match this need (Drools Expert ?) If some can explain this a little bit more, I'll be really happy to read ! And if it can be added to the current documentation, it could be a great idea too. Thanks for your help. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Expert-versus-Expert-tp1739141p2819515.... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users