I'd try using free-format DRL and breaking the expression down into smaller
parts until it works.
I can't see anything wrong with the syntax - unless it relates to the bug
Wolfgang said was fixed for 5.4.0 (I *assume* he'd mean FINAL).
The advice, as I have given before, would not to use a beta version as it
is bound to have bugs in that were fixed for FINAL.
I know you use it for the free-format text "Formula" TextBox in the RHS of
the Guided Editor, but free-format DRL (with 5.4.0.FINAL) is a suitable
workaround.
On 24 May 2012 14:55, zeeshan <zeeshan.spring(a)gmail.com> wrote:
oops......now I tried by putting $ before sumAssured....still same
error....
*[DeathBenefitRule] Unable to Analyse Expression
$deathBenefit.setSumAssured( $sumAssured * ( 1 - (1 / (Math.pow ( (1 +
($interestRate/100),$policyTerm-$policYear+1) ) ) ) ) / (1 - (1 / (Math.pow
( (1 + ($interestRate/100),$policyTerm) ) ) ) ) ); drools.update(
$deathBenefit );: [Error: unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
org.drools.spi.KnowledgeHelper.,$policyTerm()] [Near : {...
($interestRate/100),$policyTerm-$policYear+1) ) ) ....}] ^ [Line: 1,
Column:
91]*
the source code --> *1. | rule "DeathBenefitRule"
2. | dialect "mvel"
3. | when
4. | $deathBenefit : DeathBenefitFactModel( $sumAssured
:
sumAssured, $interestRate : interestRate, $policYear : policYear,
$policyTerm : policyTerm)
5. | then
6. | $deathBenefit.setSumAssured( $sumAssured * ( 1 -
(1 / (Math.pow
( (1 + ($interestRate/100),$policyTerm-$policYear+1) ) ) ) ) / (1 - (1 /
(Math.pow ( (1 + ($interestRate/100),$policyTerm) ) ) ) ) );
7. | update( $deathBenefit );
8. | end*
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-put-Power-in-Formula-box-of-THEN...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users