Thanks for the insight....I was able to figure it out with have the generic
rule listen for modifications to a certain property. The problem was that
the method being invoked by the other more specific rules was using a
convince method to modify the field so I needed to annotate the method with
the @Modifies method.
laune wrote
On 06/06/2012, gboro54 <gboro54@> wrote:
> I am using drools 5.4 and am running into a weird issue with using modify
> keyword. I have have two rules, both are similar in conditions(one rule
> catches 2 additional cases to modify the object with a generic message).
> Weather I add the checks for each rule into the into the generic rule or
> have a condition checking the object for the more specific messages to be
> added, the modify keyword seems to ignore this. In the case where the
> conditions are added to the generic rule independent the activation is
> cancelled. Any thoughts?
Yes: post more, or nothing at all.
-W
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@.jboss
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/modify-keyword-cancels-activation-unexp...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.