Michael
Here are some examples
Rule1 has "str1", "Str2", "Str3"
Rule2 has "str2", "Str3", "Str5", "Str6",
"Str7"
Rule3 has "str1", "Str3", "Str6"
etc.
With fact1 that has "str1", "Str3" , since this is subset of values
in
Rule1 and Rule3, they should not fire but Rule2 should fire
With fact2 that has "str2", "Str6", "Str7", Rule 2 should
not fire and Rule1
and Rule3 should fire.
Hope this is clear.
Thanks
Kumar
2010/10/13 Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
Thanks, please provide a specific example rule too.
Don't forget to keep your posts to the mailing list for the good of the
community.
On 12 October 2010 22:18, Kumar Pandey <kumar.pandey(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Michale
> Thanks for the response.
> Here's the link for the thread .
>
>
>
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Check-if-fact-is-subs...
>
> and the original about matching strings in two arrays.
>
>
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Matching-strings-in-t...
>
>
> My use case is that I could have hundreds of rule and each rule could have
> its own set of strings.
> A fact object is run through these rules to see which ones are fired.
> One of the condition to check is that the a list in the fact is not a
> subset of list in the rule.
> That is fire the rule only if list in fact is not a subset of list in
> rule.
>
> Thanks
> Kumar
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Michael Anstis <
> michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, I admit I don't have the original thread anymore.
>>
>> If I am not wrong (which is always a possibility) for Wolfgang's operator
>> to work you'd need to externalise the superset from the rule into
>> WorkingMemory. You could have a rule with higher salience construct the
>> superset WM fact.
>>
>> If you don't mind re-posting or providing a link to the complete thread
>> (on Nabble or somewhere) I'll happily try to help further.
>>
>> On 12 October 2010 17:23, <kumar.pandey(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> <quote author='Michael Anstis-2'>
>>>
>>> Wolfgang gave a great solution.
>>> </quote>
>>> Don't know if I'm missing something obvious here. I have a superset
in
>>> the rule itself. Each rule has a superset list. In this case how would I use
>>> Wolfgang's solution. Its comparing through two arrays in runtime. I have
not
>>> been able to construct an array construct with specific values in the rule
>>> itself.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users