Re: [rules-users] Does Drools Fusion consume a lot of memory?
And why do you talk about two accounts? Normally, you don't know much
about the "foreign" account, except when it is an "in-house"
transaction.
You'll have to redesign.
The Account type you have now is not good for what you intend to do.
It is a snapshot of an Account in a certain state, and therefore it
creates a considerable overhead in your fact database.
There are some mathematically wrong assumptions, too. For instance,
you cannot compute a "balance averaged over 30 days" by taking the
average of so many account updates.
-W
On 28/06/2012, chrisLi <shengtao0077(a)163.com> wrote:
Oops!
I did not retract these two accounts after the transaction has been
processed. I thought these two
accounts may be used later. I attempted to update these two accounts with
session.update(facthandle,
object) with assertbehaviour setting to equality. However, no rules were
fired.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Does-Drools-Fusion-consume-a-lot-of-mem...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users