[rules-users] Re: Ruleflow groups in decision tables
Mark Proctor <mproctor <at> codehaus.org> writes:
Knapp, Barry wrote:
That generic attribute would sure be a nice place to put effective and
expiration dates.
Really looking forward to the patch :)
Ok, so whose writing the patch?
Can we have a spec of whats exactly needed?!
I've been wiating for agenda Groups in Decision tables for a long time.
I've created my own ways of forcing sequence in decision tables (using extended
attributes in the condition itself); but theres room for elegance by using
AGENDA Groups.
All other attribs can be coded in conditions also; so its importat to draw a
line and say whatever falls on this side of the line is a legitimate attribute
or else the user may use a condition as a substitute.
Personally I care about AGENDA Groups the max; lack of it retards decision
tables considerably.
Thanks,
Arjun