Re: [rules-users] Expert Systems and Functional programming?

Indeed, this thesis mentions a few features of the system I was talking about :-) ([13]) -W On 11/03/2013, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: > There were a number of research efforts that looked at combining procedural > and rule base programming. > This one is quite interesting: > Combining Rule-Based and Procedural Programming in the XC and XE Programming > Lanaugages > http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.9.1106&rep=r... > > Mark > > > On 11 Mar 2013, at 18:03, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> On 11 March 2013 16:19, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: >> So thinking really long term here. Can we build a "java layer" that >> provide all the rule functionality we need - but fit ontop of the java >> language neatly. We'd probably need to allow "rule" keyword and have it in >> Classes, at the method level. All class members and methods would be >> available to the rules in that class. >> >> There is this production rule system where you can write your rules >> embedded in compiling units, and alongside the legacy program units, of a >> procedural, modular, strongly type HLL, and where you use expressions in >> the language's own syntax in constraints... >> >> We've been using it ever since 1986. Rabbi Akiva was right, wasn't he ;-) >> >> -W >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users