Re: [rules-users] DSL questions....

Lucas, Great! Thanks for the quick reply. Macon ________________________________ From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Lucas Amador Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 10:58 AM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] DSL questions.... Hi Macon, you can write all on one statement, but must be separated by comma [when]User is eligible for "{testCD}"=not MyFeature(testCD == "{testCD}") , $eligible : FeatureEligible(testCD = "{testCD}") and you will not get any overhead at runtime because all the interpretation happens at compilation, as you says lucaz El 22/10/2009, a las 11:28, Pegram, Macon escribió: All, Given the following rule: rule "Add ABC123 Feature" when not MyFeature(testCD == "ABC123") UserRequest(someValue == "ABC123_FEATURE") $eligible : FeatureEligible(testCD == "ABC123") then insert(new MyFeature($eligible)); end I'd like to create a DSL. Notice that "testCD" is the same value. Is it possible to apply a value captured in a DSL and use it in more than one condition? In the above scenario we want to see if the user is eligible for the feature ABC123, and check whether or not that feature has already been added in working memory. The DSL version of the rule might look something like: rule "Add ABC123 Feature" when User is eligible for "ABC123" User requests "ABC123_FEATURE" then Add feature end Would I need to write the DSL for the "ABC123" piece like this? [when]User is eligible for "{testCD}"=not MyFeature(testCD == "{testCD}") $eligible : FeatureEligible(testCD = "{testCD}") Or will I always need to create 2 statements? What are the performance implications of using a DSL? Is there extra overhead at runtime or does all the interpretation occur at rule compilation? Thanks! Macon _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users