Hi, is there a way to specify a ruleflow group in an (.xls) decision table (similarly to how you can specify salience or activation groups)? There doesn't seem to be anything about it in the documentation. Barring that, is anyone already working to add this functionality to the decision table parser or is it perhaps a planned feature? Because if not, I may need to look into adding that myself, which is something I'm keen to avoid (plus, I would not like to duplicate other efforts). Regards, M. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

That generic attribute would sure be a nice place to put effective and expiration dates. Really looking forward to the patch :)

Barry ____________________________________________________ Barry Knapp Barry.Knapp(a)RailInc.com office 919.651.5039 cell 919.995.0396 MSN barry25(a)hotmail.com AIM BarryRKnapp Yahoo BarryKnapp -----Original Message----- From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 11:25 AM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Ruleflow groups in decision tables Someone was just on IRC about that just now, it seems the attributes at the moment are hard coded to salience and activation-group (xor-group, the legacy name). So the short answer is no. If someone wants to roll up their sleeves what I think is needed is a general ATTRIBUTE column in the same way there are CONDITION columns. The ATTRIBUTE column would allow one or more comma delimeted attribute names. The data cell would then have values to match those delimeted attribute names. Multiple ATTRIBUTE columns should be allowed. Look forward to the patch :) Mark Matija wrote: > Hi, is there a way to specify a ruleflow group in an (.xls) decision > table (similarly to how you can specify salience or activation > groups)? There doesn't seem to be anything about it in the > documentation. > > Barring that, is anyone already working to add this functionality to > the decision table parser or is it perhaps a planned feature? Because > if not, I may need to look into adding that myself, which is something > I'm keen to avoid (plus, I would not like to duplicate other efforts). > > Regards, > > M. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users