the pending activations mean the rules in other group or this group? If a group left, all its rules will leave, right? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-use-lock-on-active-tp3558698p356... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

There are some questions on your reply: laune wrote When you say the agenda group becomes active again, do you mean the agenda group A become active? laune wrote How does the agenda group A give its focus to B? Is the API setFocus? What's kind of activations is pending when A left? On 5 December 2011 03:47, Zhao Yi <zhaoyi0113@> wrote: Rules don't "leave". Do you mean activations? If an agenda group A is left, there are two cases to consider: 1. All activations from group A have been fired. Therefore, agenda group A "loses the focus", and the agenda group that had the focus previously receives the focus (becomes active) again. 2. Focus may be given (by an API method call) to another agenda group B while there still are some activations from group A pending. Eventually, A will receive the focus again, and rule firings from A continue as usual. -W http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-use-lock-on-active-tp3558698p356... _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@.jboss https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-use-lock-on-active-tp3558698p356... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

When group A left, why does the some activations not fire when A is active? Is it because these activations have lock-on-active attribute? If so, how about if there is only one agenda group A. Will the activations be fired with lock-on-active attribute? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-use-lock-on-active-tp3558698p356... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.