9:39 p.m.
I was busy trying to draw a rete view according to what I was understanding
from the documentation, but thought it prudent to create the rule in the ide
and then look at the rete view there before assuming that I am correct. I
had a bit of shock at first as it did not look at all as I expected. After a
few deep breaths realized that the colors are probably just different. I
need confirmation if I am reading it correctly please.
Jboss Rules Documentation:
Rete Nodes
In the Eclipse IDE Rete view
It looks like the ObjectTypeNodes are Red not blue and
AlphaNodes are blue not red and the rest is the same as the documentation.
Can someone please confirm this for me before I get it all wrong.
Thanks
Aakil
12:42 a.m.
The rete diagrams in the manual are not documenting the behaviour of the
IDE, although yes we should probably align those. Open up the poperties
view in eclipse, then click on a node, it will tell you what it is and
provide other information.
Mark
Aakil Omar wrote:
I was busy trying to draw a rete view according to what I was
understanding from the documentation, but thought it prudent to create
the rule in the ide and then look at the rete view there before
assuming that I am correct. I had a bit of shock at first as it did
not look at all as I expected. After a few deep breaths realized that
the colors are probably just different. I need confirmation if I am
reading it correctly please.
Jboss Rules Documentation:
Rete Nodes
In the Eclipse IDE Rete view
It looks like the ObjectTypeNodes are Red not blue and
AlphaNodes are blue not red and the rest is the same as the
documentation. Can someone please confirm this for me before I get it
all wrong.
Thanks
Aakil
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
11:36 a.m.
Aah great thanks sorry about the stupid question.
_____
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 12:42 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] rete view colours appear diffirent to
documentation
The rete diagrams in the manual are not documenting the behaviour of the
IDE, although yes we should probably align those. Open up the poperties view
in eclipse, then click on a node, it will tell you what it is and provide
other information.
Mark
Aakil Omar wrote:
I was busy trying to draw a rete view according to what I was understanding
from the documentation, but thought it prudent to create the rule in the ide
and then look at the rete view there before assuming that I am correct. I
had a bit of shock at first as it did not look at all as I expected. After a
few deep breaths realized that the colors are probably just different. I
need confirmation if I am reading it correctly please.
Jboss Rules Documentation:
Rete Nodes
In the Eclipse IDE Rete view
It looks like the ObjectTypeNodes are Red not blue and
AlphaNodes are blue not red and the rest is the same as the documentation.
Can someone please confirm this for me before I get it all wrong.
Thanks
Aakil
_____
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
8:58 p.m.
New subject: "contains..."
Folks,
I am using MR3, have a situation when Parent has multiple Children, and
there is a rule that needs to be fired when parent has a child with
certain attribute (active == true)
Will need to do something like that :
rule
when
$p : Parent( active == false, children contains Child() [ active
== true ] )
then
... register error: inactive parent cannot have active
child.
end
Please advice on correct syntaxes how to do that. Also please keep in
mind, I don't want to insert children in facts memory.
Thanks,
-Sergey
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
6395
days inactive
6400
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Aakil Omar -
Manukyan, Sergey -
Mark Proctor