Hi Nurlan,
This feature isn't implemented yet, but will be resolved together with
the issue for multi-threading the Solver:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-681
I have a working design in my head and on paper here for the basic.
Basically, a Move will be parallelized over CPU's and JVM's.
The critical thing that made this hard is not breaking incremental score
calculation (delta's),
which would make it slower than single-threaded, not faster, but I 've
found a way to do that.
I 'll look into jgroups to do the JVM communication by default, but I
'll probably make that pluggable.
Note: better optimizations algorithms usually beat adding more CPU's -
but doing both is even better of course :)
Op 13-03-12 05:20, Nurlan schreef:
Hi, Guys!
I want to know is it possible in drools-planner paralization?
I mean solving 1 planning problem concurrently in 2 or more jvms
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Paralization-tp3821286p3821286.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet