On 16 Aug 2012, at 10:02, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com> wrote:
My thoughts:
-1 to private: Keep it public - default to open :)
If it's public and open, all
that will happen is noobs will send emails there, because they they think they will get
better answers. Which will defeat the point.
I guess we can try open, and just move to moderation or something better later. But
I'd prefer it if was something that could be community maintained. So it needs to be a
service that can start open, but allow it to be switched later, if it is deemed
necessary.
-1 to invitations: they are hurdle (even if they can request it
themselves)
+1 to google groups. It's much easier for new people to join
(web/mail/newsgroup) than the complexity we got now with
nabble/mailing-list/gmane and less issues (not all nable's post are on
the mailing list, ...).
+1 to split up the user lists per drools subproject (drools, guvnor,
planner). It would reduce and focus the volume of each list.
We can look into this
for drools 6.0. Because the "guvnor" name, and what it is, will probably undergo
an overhaul.
-1 to split up the dev list or change it somehow for now
agreed, the dev lit stays as it is. It's purpose is well known, and we
don't' have high volume yet.
Mark
Op 14-08-12 23:48, Mark Proctor schreef:
> As the user list is now high volume, i'm contemplating an "invite only"
expert list. I'm not sure who this would work, or if it's practical. But the idea
is to have a lower volume list, with a higher quality of technical questions and
discussions. This might make it easier for people to be engaged.
>
> I'm thinking of doing it as a google group "drools-expert-group" or
something.
>
> I'm not entirely sure how to decide who gets an invite or not…. as it's very
arbitrary. I guess in general anyone who gets a recommendation for someone on the list,
gets an invite. But I'm open to other ideas to run this.
>
> Ideally we should be able to setup a number of moderators, that can handle this
invite list, including people from the community. Although not sure if google groups
supports this, need to find out.
>
> Anyway would like to here what people think, and would be interest to see alternative
ways to do this. Maybe you can point to existing setups, that manage this sort of
situation, that we can copy?
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users