5:07 p.m.
Hi,
when the dialect for a package config is java, that's mean that in the
rule LHS we can't write something like this :
p:Person(age > 18)
because this is not supported by java, am I right ?
In fact my problem is the dialect concept, I don't understand this :(
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/dialect-meaning-tf4251371.html#a12099881
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
5:38 p.m.
the dialect is used for an expression like evals and return values and
code blocks like consequences.
Mark
hypnosat7 wrote:
Hi,
when the dialect for a package config is java, that's mean that in the
rule LHS we can't write something like this :
p:Person(age > 18)
because this is not supported by java, am I right ?
In fact my problem is the dialect concept, I don't understand this :(
6:54 p.m.
New subject: How to design a rule using collect for filtering? Thanks.
Hi,
I'd like to use keyword collect to do my filtering but its behaviour confused me,
please advise. I greatly appreciate your help.
Problem 1:
when
eventList : LinkedList(size == 5)
from collect( Event(text matches ".*rule5.*" ))
then
System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
I still do not see any log msg after adding 5+ events. Is something wrong with my rule?
Problem 2:
when
event: Event(text matches ".*rule5.*" ))
eventList : LinkedList(size == 5)
from collect( Event(text == event.text)
then
System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
After adding 5 events, I see 5 log msg instead of one as I'd expect.
If I add more events, I will see more log. How do I tell LHS to reset the count from
0.
Basically, I want to take 1 event out of 5 similar events (suppressing filtering). So if
there are 10 similar events, my RHS should activate 2 times, not 10 times.
Thanks,
-av
---------------------------------
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
12:07 p.m.
New subject: How to design a rule using collect for filtering? Thanks.
No single simple answer here. You need to check what would better fit
your use case.
The thing is: it is not possible to limit the number of matches to a
collect statement... all matching instances WILL match it and be collected.
No really "clean" way I can think about, but a few possible options
(haven't executed them, but shall work):
1. Simply execute the actions multiple times in the consequence:
when
eventList : LinkedList( $size : size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text
matches ".*rule5.*" ))
*then
for( int i = 0; i < $size/5; i++ )
*
System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
end
2. Flag used facts:
when
eventList : LinkedList( size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*", processed == false ))
*then
* System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
* for( int i = 0; i < 5; i++ ) {
Event e = **(Event) eventList.get( i );**
e.setProcessed( true );
update( e );
*
}
end
2. Retract used facts:
when
eventList : LinkedList( size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*" ))
*then
* System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
* for( int i = 0; i < 5; i++ ) {
Event e = **(Event) eventList.get( i );**
retract( e );
*
}
end
Hope it helps.
Edson
2007/8/10, Anh Vuong <anhtvuong(a)yahoo.com>:
Hi,
I'd like to use keyword collect to do my filtering but its behaviour
confused me, please advise. I greatly appreciate your help.
Problem 1:
when
eventList : LinkedList(size == 5)
from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*" ))
*then* System.out.println(
"rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
I still do not see any log msg after adding 5+ events. Is something wrong
with my rule?
Problem 2:
when
event: Event(text matches ".*rule5.*" ))
eventList : LinkedList(size == 5)
from collect( Event(text == event.text)
*then* System.out.println(
"rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
After adding 5 events, I see 5 log msg instead of one as I'd expect.
If I add more events, I will see more log. How do I tell LHS to reset the
count from 0.
Basically, I want to take 1 event out of 5 similar events (suppressing
filtering). So if there are 10 similar events, my RHS should activate 2
times, not 10 times.
Thanks,
-av
------------------------------
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top
picks<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48220/*http://tv.yahoo.com/>on Yahoo! TV.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
11:44 a.m.
New subject: How to design a rule using collect for filtering? Thanks.
Thanks for your help, Edson.
collect works in my simple test now, but not when I integrate with my code. Is there an
easy way to debug LHS to see if collect stmt is evaluated? I notice IllegalAccessError
since my app will load a selected list of jars upfront, so my questions are:
1) Can this error break collect?
2) How can I fix this error still using our own classLoader?
Here is the stack trace:
2007 Aug 15, 09:08:13:193 Exception IllegalAccessError
java.lang.IllegalAccessError: class org.drools.reteoo.InitialFactImplShadowProxy cannot
access its superclass org.drools.reteoo.Init
ialFactImpl
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at
org.drools.rule.MapBackedClassLoader.fastFindClass(MapBackedClassLoader.java:60)
at org.drools.rule.MapBackedClassLoader.loadClass(MapBackedClassLoader.java:79)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.loadOrGenerateProxy(Rete.java:379)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.defineShadowProxyData(Rete.java:344)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.<init>(Rete.java:320)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(Rete.java:145)
at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject(ReteooRuleBase.java:190)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory$WorkingMemoryReteAssertAction.execute(ReteooWorkingMemory.java:163)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.executeQueuedActions(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1241)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:858)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:822)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:623)
Thanks,
-av
Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com> wrote:
No single simple answer here. You need to check what would better fit your use case.
The thing is: it is not possible to limit the number of matches to a collect
statement... all matching instances WILL match it and be collected.
No really "clean" way I can think about, but a few possible options
(haven't executed them, but shall work):
1. Simply execute the actions multiple times in the consequence:
when
eventList : LinkedList( $size : size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*" ))
then
for( int i = 0; i < $size/5; i++ )
System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size ());
end
2. Flag used facts:
when
eventList : LinkedList( size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*", processed == false ))
then
System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
for( int i = 0; i < 5; i++ ) {
Event e = (Event) eventList.get ( i );
e.setProcessed( true );
update( e );
}
end
2. Retract used facts:
when
eventList : LinkedList( size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*" ))
then
System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
for( int i = 0; i < 5; i++ ) {
Event e = (Event) eventList.get( i );
retract( e );
}
end
Hope it helps.
Edson
2007/8/10, Anh Vuong <anhtvuong(a)yahoo.com>: Hi,
I'd like to use keyword collect to do my filtering but its behaviour confused me,
please advise. I greatly appreciate your help.
Problem 1:
when
eventList : LinkedList(size == 5)
from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*" ))
then System.out.println(
"rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
I still do not see any log msg after adding 5+ events. Is something wrong with my rule?
Problem 2:
when
event: Event(text matches ".*rule5.*" ))
eventList : LinkedList(size == 5)
from collect( Event(text == event.text)
then System.out.println(
"rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
After adding 5 events, I see 5 log msg instead of one as I'd expect.
If I add more events, I will see more log. How do I tell LHS to reset the count from
0.
Basically, I want to take 1 event out of 5 similar events (suppressing filtering). So if
there are 10 similar events, my RHS should activate 2 times, not 10 times.
Thanks,
-av
---------------------------------
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
---------------------------------
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
12:13 p.m.
New subject: How to design a rule using collect for filtering? Thanks.
This is a regression bug. InitialFact should not be shadowed. Can you
please open a JIRA for that?
Thank you
Edson
2007/8/15, Anh Vuong <anhtvuong(a)yahoo.com>:
Thanks for your help, Edson.
collect works in my simple test now, but not when I integrate with my
code. Is there an easy way to debug LHS to see if collect stmt is
evaluated? I notice IllegalAccessError
since my app will load a selected list of jars upfront, so my questions
are:
1) Can this error break collect?
2) How can I fix this error still using our own classLoader?
Here is the stack trace:
2007 Aug 15, 09:08:13:193 Exception IllegalAccessError
java.lang.IllegalAccessError: class
org.drools.reteoo.InitialFactImplShadowProxy cannot access its superclass
org.drools.reteoo.Init
ialFactImpl
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at org.drools.rule.MapBackedClassLoader.fastFindClass(
MapBackedClassLoader.java:60)
at org.drools.rule.MapBackedClassLoader.loadClass(
MapBackedClassLoader.java:79)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.loadOrGenerateProxy(
Rete.java:379)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.defineShadowProxyData(
Rete.java:344)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.<init>(Rete.java:320)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(Rete.java:145)
at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject(
ReteooRuleBase.java:190)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory$WorkingMemoryReteAssertAction.execute
(ReteooWorkingMemory.java:163)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.executeQueuedActions(
AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1241)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(
AbstractWorkingMemory.java:858)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(
AbstractWorkingMemory.java:822)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(
AbstractWorkingMemory.java:623)
Thanks,
-av
*Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com>* wrote:
No single simple answer here. You need to check what would better fit
your use case.
The thing is: it is not possible to limit the number of matches to a
collect statement... all matching instances WILL match it and be collected.
No really "clean" way I can think about, but a few possible options
(haven't executed them, but shall work):
1. Simply execute the actions multiple times in the consequence:
when
eventList : LinkedList( $size : size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text
matches ".*rule5.*" ))
*then
for( int i = 0; i < $size/5; i++ )
*
System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size ());
end
2. Flag used facts:
when
eventList : LinkedList( size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*", processed == false ))
*then
* System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
* for( int i = 0; i < 5; i++ ) {
Event e = **(Event) eventList.get ( i );**
e.setProcessed( true );
update( e );
*
}
end
2. Retract used facts:
when
eventList : LinkedList( size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*" ))
*then
* System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
* for( int i = 0; i < 5; i++ ) {
Event e = **(Event) eventList.get( i );* *
retract( e );
*
}
end
Hope it helps.
Edson
2007/8/10, Anh Vuong <anhtvuong(a)yahoo.com>:
>
> Hi,
> I'd like to use keyword collect to do my filtering but its behaviour
> confused me, please advise. I greatly appreciate your help.
>
> Problem 1:
>
> when
> eventList : LinkedList(size == 5)
> from collect( Event(text matches
> ".*rule5.*" ))
> *then* System.out.println(
> "rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
> I still do not see any log msg after adding 5+ events. Is something
> wrong with my rule?
>
> Problem 2:
>
> when
> event: Event(text matches ".*rule5.*" ))
> eventList : LinkedList(size == 5)
> from collect( Event(text == event.text)
> *then * System.out.println(
> "rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
> After adding 5 events, I see 5 log msg instead of one as I'd expect.
> If I add more events, I will see more log. How do I tell LHS to reset
> the count from 0.
> Basically, I want to take 1 event out of 5 similar events (suppressing
> filtering). So if there are 10 similar events, my RHS should activate 2
> times, not 10 times.
>
> Thanks,
> -av
>
> ------------------------------
> Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top
picks<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48220/*http://tv.yahoo.com/>on Yahoo! TV.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green
Center.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48246/*http://autos.yahoo.com/green...
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
2:18 p.m.
New subject: How to design a rule using collect for filtering? Thanks.
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1086 is created.
Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com> wrote:
This is a regression bug. InitialFact should not be shadowed. Can you please open a
JIRA for that?
Thank you
Edson
2007/8/15, Anh Vuong < anhtvuong(a)yahoo.com>: Thanks for your help, Edson.
collect works in my simple test now, but not when I integrate with my code. Is there an
easy way to debug LHS to see if collect stmt is evaluated? I notice IllegalAccessError
since my app will load a selected list of jars upfront, so my questions are:
1) Can this error break collect?
2) How can I fix this error still using our own classLoader?
Here is the stack trace:
2007 Aug 15, 09:08:13:193 Exception IllegalAccessError
java.lang.IllegalAccessError: class org.drools.reteoo.InitialFactImplShadowProxy cannot
access its superclass org.drools.reteoo.Init
ialFactImpl
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at
org.drools.rule.MapBackedClassLoader.fastFindClass(MapBackedClassLoader.java:60)
at org.drools.rule.MapBackedClassLoader.loadClass(MapBackedClassLoader.java:79)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass (Unknown Source)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.loadOrGenerateProxy(Rete.java:379)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.defineShadowProxyData(Rete.java:344)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf .<init>(Rete.java:320)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(Rete.java:145)
at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject(ReteooRuleBase.java:190)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory$WorkingMemoryReteAssertAction.execute(ReteooWorkingMemory.java:163)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.executeQueuedActions(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1241)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:858)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:822)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:623)
Thanks,
-av
Edson Tirelli < tirelli(a)post.com> wrote:
No single simple answer here. You need to check what would better fit your use case.
The thing is: it is not possible to limit the number of matches to a collect
statement... all matching instances WILL match it and be collected.
No really "clean" way I can think about, but a few possible options
(haven't executed them, but shall work):
1. Simply execute the actions multiple times in the consequence:
when
eventList : LinkedList( $size : size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*" ))
then
for( int i = 0; i < $size/5; i++ )
System.out.println( "rule5 is fired " + eventList.size ());
end
2. Flag used facts:
when
eventList : LinkedList( size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*", processed == false ))
then
System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size ());
for( int i = 0; i < 5; i++ ) {
Event e = (Event) eventList.get ( i );
e.setProcessed ( true );
update( e );
}
end
2. Retract used facts:
when
eventList : LinkedList( size >= 5 ) from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*" ))
then
System.out.println("rule5 is fired " + eventList.size ());
for( int i = 0; i < 5; i++ ) {
Event e = (Event) eventList.get( i );
retract( e );
}
end
Hope it helps.
Edson
2007/8/10, Anh Vuong < anhtvuong(a)yahoo.com>: Hi,
I'd like to use keyword collect to do my filtering but its behaviour confused me,
please advise. I greatly appreciate your help.
Problem 1:
when
eventList : LinkedList(size == 5)
from collect( Event(text matches
".*rule5.*" ))
then System.out.println(
"rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
I still do not see any log msg after adding 5+ events. Is something wrong with my rule?
Problem 2:
when
event: Event(text matches ".*rule5.*" ))
eventList : LinkedList(size == 5)
from collect( Event(text == event.text)
then System.out.println(
"rule5 is fired " + eventList.size());
After adding 5 events, I see 5 log msg instead of one as I'd expect.
If I add more events, I will see more log. How do I tell LHS to reset the count from
0.
Basically, I want to take 1 event out of 5 similar events (suppressing filtering). So if
there are 10 similar events, my RHS should activate 2 times, not 10 times.
Thanks,
-av
---------------------------------
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
---------------------------------
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
---------------------------------
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
7:32 p.m.
New subject: Are rules with time windows supported? Thanks.
Hi,
My understanding is that time window rule is not supported yet in 4.0 after checking the
manual and followed some blogs regarding SEP/CEP. I wonder if some workaround can be done
for simple case such as collect some similar events over 1 minute. Will time window
feature be included soon?
Thanks,
anh
---------------------------------
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
8:24 a.m.
New subject: Are rules with time windows supported? Thanks.
You are right. Time windows are not yet supported in Drools 4. It is a
feature that will be included in the next major versions.
You can "emulate" time windows using Time objects, but of course it will
require more work as compared to built in time window support.
Edson
2007/8/20, Anh Vuong <anhtvuong(a)yahoo.com>:
Hi,
My understanding is that time window rule is not supported yet in 4.0after checking the
manual and followed some blogs regarding SEP/CEP. I
wonder if some workaround can be done for simple case such as collect some
similar events over 1 minute. Will time window feature be included soon?
Thanks,
anh
------------------------------
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48254/*http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/_ylc=X3oDM...
someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
10:47 a.m.
New subject: Are rules with time windows supported? Thanks.
Do you have an example to use Time object in rule? What is the timeframe for the next
major version ( 5.0 ?). Do you have something in there yet that I can try.
Thanks,
anh
Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com> wrote:
You are right. Time windows are not yet supported in Drools 4. It is a feature that
will be included in the next major versions.
You can "emulate" time windows using Time objects, but of course it will
require more work as compared to built in time window support.
Edson
2007/8/20, Anh Vuong <anhtvuong(a)yahoo.com>: Hi,
My understanding is that time window rule is not supported yet in 4.0 after checking the
manual and followed some blogs regarding SEP/CEP. I wonder if some workaround can be done
for simple case such as collect some similar events over 1 minute. Will time window
feature be included soon?
Thanks,
anh
---------------------------------
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
---------------------------------
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
1:59 p.m.
New subject: Are rules with time windows supported? Thanks.
I too am very interested in this type of capability. I'm current
using a combination of Esper and Drools but would prefer to use a
single product.
--ming
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com> wrote:
You are right. Time windows are not yet supported in Drools 4. It
is a feature that will be included in the next major versions.
You can "emulate" time windows using Time objects, but of course
it will require more work as compared to built in time window support.
Edson
2007/8/20, Anh Vuong <anhtvuong(a)yahoo.com>:
Hi,
My understanding is that time window rule is not supported yet in
4.0 after checking the manual and followed some blogs regarding SEP/
CEP. I wonder if some workaround can be done for simple case such
as collect some similar events over 1 minute. Will time window
feature be included soon?
Thanks,
anh
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who
knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
7:09 a.m.
New subject: Are rules with time windows supported? Thanks.
Yes, this is my personal top priority for the next major release, but
still requires research to be done right.
Answering Anh, there is an old blog entry on a way to do such things:
http://blog.athico.com/search/label/Time-Sensitive
But again, this is a general way of working with time sensitive rules and
to manually manage time windows while we don't have built-in support. With
built-in support, things get a lot easier and more declarative than the
examples showed there.
[]s
Edson
2007/8/21, Ming Fang <mingfang(a)mac.com>:
I too am very interested in this type of capability. I'm current using a
combination of Esper and Drools but would prefer to use a single product.
--ming
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com> wrote:
You are right. Time windows are not yet supported in Drools 4. It is a
feature that will be included in the next major versions.
You can "emulate" time windows using Time objects, but of course it
will require more work as compared to built in time window support.
Edson
2007/8/20, Anh Vuong < <anhtvuong@yahoo.com>anhtvuong(a)yahoo.com>:
>
> Hi,
> My understanding is that time window rule is not supported yet in 4.0after checking
the manual and followed some blogs regarding SEP/CEP. I
> wonder if some workaround can be done for simple case such as collect some
> similar events over 1 minute. Will time window feature be included soon?
>
> Thanks,
> anh
>
> ------------------------------
> Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers
>
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48254/*http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/_ylc=X3oDM...
> someone who knows.
> Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> <rules-users@lists.jboss.org>rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ <http://www.jboss.com>www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
6306
days inactive
6318
days old
11 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Anh Vuong -
Edson Tirelli -
hypnosat7 -
Mark Proctor -
Ming Fang