10:35 a.m.
I understand that as this rule is written below it will be compiled into 2
subrules which both fire. I searched the archives and found a post where
Mark Proctor suggested "Bind each pattern, and do the || field constraints
in an eval.". I'm new to Drools, can someone elaborate on how I would do
that with the rule below?
rule "Test"
when
(CoApplicant( relationship == "S" ) or (Contract ( state
in ("CO", "IL"))))
then
...
Thanks
Kent
10:57 a.m.
I think I found the answer to my question:
rule "Test"
when
CoApplicant( $relationship : relationship )
Contract ( $state : state )
eval ($relationship == "S" || $state == "CO" || $state
==
"IL")
...
Thanks
kfs2(a)chrysler.com
Sent by: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
01/16/2009 11:40 AM
Please respond to
Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
To
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
cc
Subject
[rules-users] or condition - subrules
I understand that as this rule is written below it will be compiled into 2
subrules which both fire. I searched the archives and found a post where
Mark Proctor suggested "Bind each pattern, and do the || field constraints
in an eval.". I'm new to Drools, can someone elaborate on how I would do
that with the rule below?
rule "Test"
when
(CoApplicant( relationship == "S" ) or (Contract ( state
in ("CO", "IL"))))
then
...
Thanks
Kent _______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
11:39 a.m.
This would certainly work, but you should evaluate the performance carefully. This is a
cartesian join, and will run the eval() statement (number of CoApplicant objects) *
(number of Contract objects) on startup, (number of CoApplicant objects) times when ANY
Contract changes or is asserted, and (number of Contract objects) times when ANY
CoApplicant changes or is asserted. It's basically the worst case for rule
performance.
--- On Fri, 1/16/09, kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com <kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com> wrote:
From: kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com <kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] or condition - subrules
To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 10:57 AM
I think I found the answer to my question:
rule "Test"
when
CoApplicant( $relationship : relationship )
Contract ( $state : state )
eval ($relationship == "S" ||
$state == "CO" || $state ==
"IL")
...
Thanks
kfs2(a)chrysler.com
Sent by: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
01/16/2009 11:40 AM
Please respond to
Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
To
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
cc
Subject
[rules-users] or condition - subrules
I understand that as this rule is written below it will be
compiled into 2
subrules which both fire. I searched the archives and
found a post where
Mark Proctor suggested "Bind each pattern, and do the
|| field constraints
in an eval.". I'm new to Drools, can someone
elaborate on how I would do
that with the rule below?
rule "Test"
when
(CoApplicant( relationship == "S"
) or (Contract ( state
in ("CO", "IL"))))
then
...
Thanks
Kent _______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
7:17 a.m.
תמיד נחמד לראות עוד ישראלים באינטרנט.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:57 PM, <kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com> wrote:
I think I found the answer to my question:
rule "Test"
*when*
CoApplicant( $relationship : relationship )
Contract ( $state : state )
*eval* ($relationship == "S" || $state == "CO" ||
$state
== "IL")
...
Thanks
*kfs2(a)chrysler.com*
Sent by: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
01/16/2009 11:40 AM
Please respond to
Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
To
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org cc
Subject
[rules-users] or condition - subrules
I understand that as this rule is written below it will be compiled into 2
subrules which both fire. I searched the archives and found a post where
Mark Proctor suggested "Bind each pattern, and do the || field constraints
in an eval.". I'm new to Drools, can someone elaborate on how I would do
that with the rule below?
rule "Test"
when
(CoApplicant( relationship == "S" ) or (Contract ( state in
("CO", "IL"))))
then
...
Thanks
Kent _______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Cheers,
Maxim Veksler
"Free as in Freedom" - Do u GNU ?
2:09 p.m.
New subject: guvnor - cannot delete business rule assets
Drools 5.0.0.M4 Guvnor Standalone
There does not appear to be an option for deleting business rule assets.
The delete button does show up for technical assets.
Is it based on some context that I am not aware of?
Thanks
Kent
4:29 p.m.
New subject: guvnor - cannot delete business rule assets
Hi Kent,
I think if you archive your rule (with the archive button) you can then go
into the archive area of Administration and delete them.
cheers
Steve
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:09 AM, <kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com> wrote:
*Drools 5.0.0.M4 Guvnor Standalone*
There does not appear to be an option for deleting business rule assets.
The delete button does show up for technical assets.
Is it based on some context that I am not aware of?
Thanks
Kent
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Steven Williams
Supervising Consultant
Object Consulting
Office: 8615 4500 Mob: 0439 898 668 Fax: 8615 4501
steven.williams(a)objectconsulting.com.au
www.objectconsulting.com.au
consulting | development | training | support
our experience makes the difference
10:59 a.m.
I think it would be like this:
rule "Test"
when
$ca: CoApplicant()
$co: Contract()
eval ( $c1.getRelationship().equals("S") ||
$co.getState().equals("CO") ||
$co.getState().equals("IL") ))
then
...
I am no expert but you also might be able to achieve what you want a
little more efficiently with a global that ensures the consequence only
executes once:
global boolean flag = true;
rule "Test"
when
(CoApplicant( relationship == "S" ) or (Contract ( state
in ("CO", "IL"))))
eval( flag )
then
flag = false;
...
kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com [1/16/2009 11:35 AM] wrote:
I understand that as this rule is written below it will be compiled
into 2 subrules which both fire. I searched the archives and found a
post where Mark Proctor suggested "Bind each pattern, and do the ||
field constraints in an eval.". I'm new to Drools, can someone
elaborate on how I would do that with the rule below?
rule "Test"
when
(CoApplicant( relationship == "S" ) or (Contract (
state in ("CO", "IL"))))
then
...
Thanks
Kent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
11:31 a.m.
Since you're doing "or" between two different object types you can't
combine it using "||".
"||" is used only inside one condition element, while "or" is between
condition elements, and a condition element will only match one object type. (I figure
this is why multiple rules are generated with "or" because you can write
expressions that potentially match objects of different type.)
"||" can be used to create a disjunctive test on a single property:
CoApplicant( relationship == "S" || == "foo" )
It can also be used with multiple properties:
CoApplicant( relationship == "S" || otherProperty == "bar" )
But there's no way I know of to use "||" between types.
--- On Fri, 1/16/09, kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com <kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com> wrote:
From: kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com <kfs2(a)chryslerfinancial.com>
Subject: [rules-users] or condition - subrules
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 10:35 AM
I understand that as this rule is written below it will be
compiled into 2
subrules which both fire. I searched the archives and
found a post where
Mark Proctor suggested "Bind each pattern, and do the
|| field constraints
in an eval.". I'm new to Drools, can someone
elaborate on how I would do
that with the rule below?
rule "Test"
when
(CoApplicant( relationship == "S"
) or (Contract ( state
in ("CO", "IL"))))
then
...
Thanks
Kent _______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
5839
days inactive
5843
days old
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Greg Barton -
kfs2＠chryslerfinancial.com -
Maxim Veksler -
Scott Reed -
Steven Williams