9:42 a.m.
All,
If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you were adding an or
type syntax where you could compare a value against multiple values. What
is the new syntax for it?
I am looking to do something logically like:
MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
Ron
10:02 a.m.
Answered my own question:
MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
All,
If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you were adding an
or type syntax where you could compare a value against multiple values.
What is the new syntax for it?
I am looking to do something logically like:
MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
Ron
10:10 a.m.
OK, this does not looked correct syntax or that it is supported. Here is
the exception I get:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.test.MainBasedTester.testRules(
MainBasedTester.java:31)
at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.test.MainBasedTester.main(
MainBasedTester.java:23)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failure loading the Rules
at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules.RtvDecisionEngine.<clinit>(
RtvDecisionEngine.java:48)
... 2 more
Caused by: org.drools.rule.InvalidRulePackage: [22,59]: unknown:22:59
Unexpected token '|'[22,89]: unknown:22:89 mismatched token:
[@162,707:707=')',<13>,22:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[33,59]:
unknown:33:59 Unexpected token '|'[33,89]: unknown:33:89 mismatched token:
[@263,1112:1112=')',<13>,33:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[44,59]:
unknown:44:59 Unexpected token '|'[44,89]: unknown:44:89 mismatched token:
[@364,1510:1510=')',<13>,44:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[55,59]:
unknown:55:59 Unexpected token '|'[55,89]: unknown:55:89 mismatched token:
[@465,1924:1924=')',<13>,55:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN
at org.drools.rule.Package.checkValidity(Package.java:409)
at org.drools.common.AbstractRuleBase.addPackage(AbstractRuleBase.java
:262)
at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules.RtvDecisionEngine.<clinit>(
RtvDecisionEngine.java:44)
... 2 more
And here is my rules:
#created on: Jul 7, 2007
package com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules
#list any import classes here.
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.math.BigInteger;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.Constants;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.DocumentTypes;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.StatusConstants;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.EffectivePrice;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.RtvHeader;
#declare any global variables here
rule "Line Set Open #1"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.OPEN)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Open #1");
rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Open #2"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.OPEN)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Open #2");
rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.OPEN);
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Matched #1"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.MATCHED)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Matched #1");
rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Matched #2"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.MATCHED)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Matched #2");
rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.MATCHED);
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Approval #1"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Approval #1");
rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.APPROVAL);
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Approval #2"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.OPEN )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Approval #2");
rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Approval #3"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.OPEN )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Approval #3");
rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
update(rtvHeader);
end
As another note, the JBoss Rules IDE is NOT reporting any errors with the
syntax.
On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Answered my own question:
MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you were adding an
> or type syntax where you could compare a value against multiple values.
> What is the new syntax for it?
>
> I am looking to do something logically like:
>
> MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
>
> Ron
>
10:38 a.m.
OK, here is the problem:
I currently have this:
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
but if I switch it to use a quoted string value like the following:
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == "Matched" | == "Approval" )
It works...Is this a bug?
On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
OK, this does not looked correct syntax or that it is supported. Here is
the exception I get:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.test.MainBasedTester.testRules (
MainBasedTester.java:31)
at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.test.MainBasedTester.main(
MainBasedTester.java:23)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failure loading the Rules
at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules.RtvDecisionEngine .<clinit>(
RtvDecisionEngine.java:48)
... 2 more
Caused by: org.drools.rule.InvalidRulePackage: [22,59]: unknown:22:59
Unexpected token '|'[22,89]: unknown:22:89 mismatched token:
[@162,707:707=')',<13>,22:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[33,59]:
unknown:33:59 Unexpected token '|'[33,89]: unknown:33:89 mismatched token:
[@263,1112:1112=')',<13>,33:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[44,59]:
unknown:44:59 Unexpected token '|'[44,89]: unknown:44:89 mismatched token:
[@364,1510:1510=')',<13>,44:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[55,59]:
unknown:55:59 Unexpected token '|'[55,89]: unknown:55:89 mismatched token:
[@465,1924:1924=')',<13>,55:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN
at org.drools.rule.Package.checkValidity(Package.java:409)
at org.drools.common.AbstractRuleBase.addPackage(AbstractRuleBase.java
:262)
at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules.RtvDecisionEngine.<clinit>(
RtvDecisionEngine.java:44)
... 2 more
And here is my rules:
#created on: Jul 7, 2007
package com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules
#list any import classes here.
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.math.BigInteger;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.Constants;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.DocumentTypes;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.StatusConstants;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.EffectivePrice ;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.RtvHeader;
#declare any global variables here
rule "Line Set Open #1"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.OPEN)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Open #1");
rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Open #2"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.OPEN)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Open #2");
rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.OPEN);
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Matched #1"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.MATCHED)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Matched #1");
rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Matched #2"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.MATCHED)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Matched #2");
rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.MATCHED);
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Approval #1"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Approval #1");
rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.APPROVAL );
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Approval #2"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.OPEN )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Approval #2");
rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED );
update(rtvHeader);
end
rule "Line Set Approval #3"
salience -10
when
rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.OPEN )
then
System.out.println("Line Set Approval #3");
rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED );
update(rtvHeader);
end
As another note, the JBoss Rules IDE is NOT reporting any errors with the
syntax.
On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Answered my own question:
>
> MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
> StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
>
> On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you were adding
> > an or type syntax where you could compare a value against multiple values.
> > What is the new syntax for it?
> >
> > I am looking to do something logically like:
> >
> > MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
> >
> > Ron
> >
>
>
10:41 a.m.
And it looks like the != operator is not allowed either:
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != "Matched" | != "Approval" )
Does not work
On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
OK, here is the problem:
I currently have this:
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
but if I switch it to use a quoted string value like the following:
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == "Matched" | == "Approval" )
It works...Is this a bug?
On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK, this does not looked correct syntax or that it is supported. Here
> is the exception I get:
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
> at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.test.MainBasedTester.testRules (
> MainBasedTester.java:31)
> at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.test.MainBasedTester.main(
> MainBasedTester.java:23)
> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failure loading the Rules
> at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules.RtvDecisionEngine .<clinit>(
> RtvDecisionEngine.java:48)
> ... 2 more
> Caused by: org.drools.rule.InvalidRulePackage: [22,59]: unknown:22:59
> Unexpected token '|'[22,89]: unknown:22:89 mismatched token:
> [@162,707:707=')',<13>,22:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[33,59]:
> unknown:33:59 Unexpected token '|'[33,89]: unknown:33:89 mismatched token:
> [@263,1112:1112=')',<13>,33:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[44,59]:
> unknown:44:59 Unexpected token '|'[44,89]: unknown:44:89 mismatched token:
> [@364,1510:1510=')',<13>,44:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[55,59]:
> unknown:55:59 Unexpected token '|'[55,89]: unknown:55:89 mismatched token:
> [@465,1924:1924=')',<13>,55:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN
> at org.drools.rule.Package.checkValidity(Package.java:409)
> at org.drools.common.AbstractRuleBase.addPackage(
> AbstractRuleBase.java:262)
> at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules.RtvDecisionEngine.<clinit>(
> RtvDecisionEngine.java:44)
> ... 2 more
>
> And here is my rules:
>
> #created on: Jul 7, 2007
> package com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules
>
> #list any import classes here.
> import java.math.BigDecimal;
> import java.math.BigInteger;
>
> import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.Constants;
> import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.DocumentTypes;
> import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.StatusConstants;
>
> import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.EffectivePrice ;
> import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.RtvHeader;
>
>
> #declare any global variables here
>
> rule "Line Set Open #1"
> salience -10
> when
> rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.OPEN)
> rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
> StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
> then
> System.out.println("Line Set Open #1");
> rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
> update(rtvHeader);
> end
>
> rule "Line Set Open #2"
> salience -10
> when
> rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.OPEN)
> rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
> StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
> then
> System.out.println("Line Set Open #2");
> rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.OPEN);
> update(rtvHeader);
> end
>
> rule "Line Set Matched #1"
> salience -10
> when
> rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.MATCHED)
> rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
> StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
> then
> System.out.println("Line Set Matched #1");
> rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
> update(rtvHeader);
> end
>
> rule "Line Set Matched #2"
> salience -10
> when
> rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.MATCHED)
> rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
> StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
> then
> System.out.println("Line Set Matched #2");
> rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.MATCHED);
> update(rtvHeader);
> end
>
> rule "Line Set Approval #1"
> salience -10
> when
> rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
> rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED )
> then
> System.out.println("Line Set Approval #1");
> rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.APPROVAL );
> update(rtvHeader);
> end
>
> rule "Line Set Approval #2"
> salience -10
> when
> rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
> rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.OPEN )
> then
> System.out.println("Line Set Approval #2");
> rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED );
> update(rtvHeader);
> end
>
> rule "Line Set Approval #3"
> salience -10
> when
> rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
> rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.OPEN )
> then
> System.out.println("Line Set Approval #3");
> rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED );
> update(rtvHeader);
> end
>
>
> As another note, the JBoss Rules IDE is NOT reporting any errors with
> the syntax.
>
> On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Answered my own question:
> >
> > MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
> > StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
> >
> > On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you were
> > > adding an or type syntax where you could compare a value against multiple
> > > values. What is the new syntax for it?
> > >
> > > I am looking to do something logically like:
> > >
> > > MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> >
> >
>
11:36 a.m.
OK, Ignore this one as well. It looks like the syntax changed slight from
the blog entry. The connector for the fields is || versus the single | in
the blog.
Thanks!
On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
And it looks like the != operator is not allowed either:
rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != "Matched" | != "Approval" )
Does not work
On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK, here is the problem:
>
> I currently have this:
>
> rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
> StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
>
> but if I switch it to use a quoted string value like the following:
>
> rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == "Matched" | == "Approval" )
>
> It works...Is this a bug?
>
> On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, this does not looked correct syntax or that it is supported. Here
> > is the exception I get:
> >
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
> > at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.test.MainBasedTester.testRules (
> > MainBasedTester.java:31)
> > at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.test.MainBasedTester.main(
> > MainBasedTester.java:23)
> > Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failure loading the Rules
> > at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules.RtvDecisionEngine .<clinit>(
> > RtvDecisionEngine.java:48)
> > ... 2 more
> > Caused by: org.drools.rule.InvalidRulePackage: [22,59]: unknown:22:59
> > Unexpected token '|'[22,89]: unknown:22:89 mismatched token:
> > [@162,707:707=')',<13>,22:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[33,59]:
> > unknown:33:59 Unexpected token '|'[33,89]: unknown:33:89 mismatched
token:
> > [@263,1112:1112=')',<13>,33:89]; expecting type
LEFT_PAREN[44,59]:
> > unknown:44:59 Unexpected token '|'[44,89]: unknown:44:89 mismatched
token:
> > [@364,1510:1510=')',<13>,44:89]; expecting type
LEFT_PAREN[55,59]:
> > unknown:55:59 Unexpected token '|'[55,89]: unknown:55:89 mismatched
token:
> > [@465,1924:1924=')',<13>,55:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN
> > at org.drools.rule.Package.checkValidity(Package.java:409)
> > at org.drools.common.AbstractRuleBase.addPackage(
> > AbstractRuleBase.java:262)
> > at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules.RtvDecisionEngine.<clinit>(
> > RtvDecisionEngine.java:44)
> > ... 2 more
> >
> > And here is my rules:
> >
> > #created on: Jul 7, 2007
> > package com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules
> >
> > #list any import classes here.
> > import java.math.BigDecimal;
> > import java.math.BigInteger;
> >
> > import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.Constants;
> > import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.DocumentTypes;
> > import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.StatusConstants;
> >
> > import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.EffectivePrice ;
> > import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.RtvHeader;
> >
> >
> > #declare any global variables here
> >
> > rule "Line Set Open #1"
> > salience -10
> > when
> > rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> > cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.OPEN)
> > rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
> > StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
> > then
> > System.out.println("Line Set Open #1");
> > rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
> > update(rtvHeader);
> > end
> >
> > rule "Line Set Open #2"
> > salience -10
> > when
> > rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> > cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.OPEN)
> > rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
> > StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
> > then
> > System.out.println("Line Set Open #2");
> > rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.OPEN);
> > update(rtvHeader);
> > end
> >
> > rule "Line Set Matched #1"
> > salience -10
> > when
> > rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> > cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.MATCHED)
> > rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
> > StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
> > then
> > System.out.println("Line Set Matched #1");
> > rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
> > update(rtvHeader);
> > end
> >
> > rule "Line Set Matched #2"
> > salience -10
> > when
> > rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> > cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.MATCHED)
> > rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
> > StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
> > then
> > System.out.println("Line Set Matched #2");
> > rtvHeader.setStatus (StatusConstants.MATCHED);
> > update(rtvHeader);
> > end
> >
> > rule "Line Set Approval #1"
> > salience -10
> > when
> > rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> > cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
> > rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED )
> > then
> > System.out.println("Line Set Approval #1");
> > rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.APPROVAL );
> > update(rtvHeader);
> > end
> >
> > rule "Line Set Approval #2"
> > salience -10
> > when
> > rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> > cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
> > rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.OPEN )
> > then
> > System.out.println("Line Set Approval #2");
> > rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED );
> > update(rtvHeader);
> > end
> >
> > rule "Line Set Approval #3"
> > salience -10
> > when
> > rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
> > cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
> > rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.OPEN )
> > then
> > System.out.println("Line Set Approval #3");
> > rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED );
> > update(rtvHeader);
> > end
> >
> >
> > As another note, the JBoss Rules IDE is NOT reporting any errors with
> > the syntax.
> >
> > On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Answered my own question:
> > >
> > > MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
> > > StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
> > >
> > > On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you were
> > > > adding an or type syntax where you could compare a value against
multiple
> > > > values. What is the new syntax for it?
> > > >
> > > > I am looking to do something logically like:
> > > >
> > > > MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
> > > >
> > > > Ron
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
12:13 p.m.
Sorry it's now && and ||
You can also us the 'in' operator
Cheese( type in ( 'stilton', 'brie' ))
Cheese( type not in ( 'stilton', 'brie' ))
Cheese( type memberOf $myCheeseTypeList )
Cheese( type not memberOf $myCheeseTypeList )
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Answered my own question:
MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
On 7/7/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ron.difrango@gmail.com>> wrote:
All,
If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you were
adding an or type syntax where you could compare a value against
multiple values. What is the new syntax for it?
I am looking to do something logically like:
MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
Ron
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
4:56 p.m.
Nice; an in operator just like SQL :-)
On 7/7/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
Sorry it's now && and ||
You can also us the 'in' operator
Cheese( type in ( 'stilton', 'brie' ))
Cheese( type not in ( 'stilton', 'brie' ))
Cheese( type memberOf $myCheeseTypeList )
Cheese( type not memberOf $myCheeseTypeList )
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Answered my own question:
MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you were adding an
> or type syntax where you could compare a value against multiple values.
> What is the new syntax for it?
>
> I am looking to do something logically like:
>
> MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
>
> Ron
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
5:29 p.m.
The 'in' operator is just sugar for == 'stilton' || == 'brie' but
we
felt it improved the declarative nature of the language sufficiently to
warrant the sugar.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Nice; an in operator just like SQL :-)
On 7/7/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
<mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
Sorry it's now && and ||
You can also us the 'in' operator
Cheese( type in ( 'stilton', 'brie' ))
Cheese( type not in ( 'stilton', 'brie' ))
Cheese( type memberOf $myCheeseTypeList )
Cheese( type not memberOf $myCheeseTypeList )
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> Answered my own question:
>
> MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
> StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
>
> On 7/7/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:ron.difrango@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you
> were adding an or type syntax where you could compare a value
> against multiple values. What is the new syntax for it?
>
> I am looking to do something logically like:
>
> MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
>
> Ron
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
>
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
6398
days inactive
6399
days old
8 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Mark Proctor -
Ronald R. DiFrango