November 2018 - teiid-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5537) Move Thorntail examples to use new modules

by Steven Hawkins (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Steven Hawkins edited comment on TEIID-5537 at 11/9/18 10:47 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------------- so you want something like: {code} teiid/ thorntail/ examples fractions config-api {code} was (Author: shawkins): so you want something like: teiid/ thorntail/ examples fractions config-api > Move Thorntail examples to use new modules > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: TEIID-5537 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5537 > Project: Teiid > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Ramesh Reddy > Assignee: Steven Hawkins > Priority: Major > > Also, how about closing the "thorntail-examples" repo and merging the examples with the new Thontail repo? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5537) Move Thorntail examples to use new modules

by Steven Hawkins (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Steven Hawkins commented on TEIID-5537: --------------------------------------- so you want something like: teiid/ thorntail/ examples fractions config-api > Move Thorntail examples to use new modules > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: TEIID-5537 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5537 > Project: Teiid > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Ramesh Reddy > Assignee: Steven Hawkins > Priority: Major > > Also, how about closing the "thorntail-examples" repo and merging the examples with the new Thontail repo? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5534) Smaller initial memory buffer allocations

by Steven Hawkins (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Steven Hawkins resolved TEIID-5534. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Done Changed the code to allocate in 1/4 increments for smaller vms - but did not yet add any logic to reclaim them if unused. > Smaller initial memory buffer allocations > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: TEIID-5534 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5534 > Project: Teiid > Issue Type: Quality Risk > Components: Query Engine > Reporter: Steven Hawkins > Assignee: Steven Hawkins > Priority: Major > Fix For: 12.0, 11.2.1 > > > For smaller vms, under 16 GB, the default allocation scheme for on-heap fixed memory buffers is in 1 GB increments. > This can be quite large for VMs under 8 GBs - especially if the full commit of that memory is not needed. > The allocation scheme should introduce the buffers more incrementally and release them when compaction is run if they aren't needed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5532) Common table projection minimization does not account for usage in a subquery nested in an aggregate or in some view scenarios

by RH Bugzilla Integration (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] RH Bugzilla Integration updated TEIID-5532: ------------------------------------------- Bugzilla References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647926 Bugzilla Update: Perform > Common table projection minimization does not account for usage in a subquery nested in an aggregate or in some view scenarios > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TEIID-5532 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5532 > Project: Teiid > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Query Engine > Reporter: Steven Hawkins > Assignee: Steven Hawkins > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 11.0.3, 11.1.2, 12.0, 11.2.1 > > > Nesting the usage of a common table in an aggregate means that the columns can be removed inappropriately by projection minimization. A query such as: > with CTE1 as /*+ no_inline */ (SELECT e1, e2, e3 from pm1.g1) > select array_agg((select e3 from cte1 where e1=pm1.g2.e1 and e2=pm1.g2.e2)) from pm1.g2 > will return null values for all e3 as projection minimization of CTE1 will replace the column with a null value. > A similar situation occurs when the query above is defined instead in a view. A similar issue was captured on TEIID-5535 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5532) Common table projection minimization does not account for usage in a subquery nested in an aggregate or in some view scenarios

by Steven Hawkins (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Steven Hawkins resolved TEIID-5532. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Done Marking as resolved now that further cases involving CTEs nested in views are also addressed. In short we needed to use a different collection mechanism to discover all of the commands. > Common table projection minimization does not account for usage in a subquery nested in an aggregate or in some view scenarios > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TEIID-5532 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5532 > Project: Teiid > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Query Engine > Reporter: Steven Hawkins > Assignee: Steven Hawkins > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 11.0.3, 11.1.2, 12.0, 11.2.1 > > > Nesting the usage of a common table in an aggregate means that the columns can be removed inappropriately by projection minimization. A query such as: > with CTE1 as /*+ no_inline */ (SELECT e1, e2, e3 from pm1.g1) > select array_agg((select e3 from cte1 where e1=pm1.g2.e1 and e2=pm1.g2.e2)) from pm1.g2 > will return null values for all e3 as projection minimization of CTE1 will replace the column with a null value. > A similar situation occurs when the query above is defined instead in a view. A similar issue was captured on TEIID-5535 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5532) Common table projection minimization does not account for usage in a subquery nested in an aggregate or in some view scenarios

by Steven Hawkins (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Steven Hawkins updated TEIID-5532: ---------------------------------- Description: Nesting the usage of a common table in an aggregate means that the columns can be removed inappropriately by projection minimization. A query such as: with CTE1 as /*+ no_inline */ (SELECT e1, e2, e3 from pm1.g1) select array_agg((select e3 from cte1 where e1=pm1.g2.e1 and e2=pm1.g2.e2)) from pm1.g2 will return null values for all e3 as projection minimization of CTE1 will replace the column with a null value. A similar situation occurs when the query above is defined instead in a view. A similar issue was captured on TEIID-5535 was: Nesting the usage of a common table in an aggregate means that the columns can be removed inappropriately by projection minimization. A query such as: with CTE1 as /*+ no_inline */ (SELECT e1, e2, e3 from pm1.g1) select array_agg((select e3 from cte1 where e1=pm1.g2.e1 and e2=pm1.g2.e2)) from pm1.g2 will return null values for all e3 as projection minimization of CTE1 will replace the column with a null value. Summary: Common table projection minimization does not account for usage in a subquery nested in an aggregate or in some view scenarios (was: Common table projection minimization does not account for usage in a subquery nested in an aggregate) > Common table projection minimization does not account for usage in a subquery nested in an aggregate or in some view scenarios > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TEIID-5532 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5532 > Project: Teiid > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Query Engine > Reporter: Steven Hawkins > Assignee: Steven Hawkins > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 11.0.3, 11.1.2, 12.0, 11.2.1 > > > Nesting the usage of a common table in an aggregate means that the columns can be removed inappropriately by projection minimization. A query such as: > with CTE1 as /*+ no_inline */ (SELECT e1, e2, e3 from pm1.g1) > select array_agg((select e3 from cte1 where e1=pm1.g2.e1 and e2=pm1.g2.e2)) from pm1.g2 > will return null values for all e3 as projection minimization of CTE1 will replace the column with a null value. > A similar situation occurs when the query above is defined instead in a view. A similar issue was captured on TEIID-5535 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5536) Create separate repository for Thorntail modules

by Ramesh Reddy (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Ramesh Reddy reassigned TEIID-5536: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Ramesh Reddy (was: Steven Hawkins) > Create separate repository for Thorntail modules > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TEIID-5536 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5536 > Project: Teiid > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Ramesh Reddy > Assignee: Ramesh Reddy > Priority: Major > > THORN-2232 Removes the Teiid modules from the core Thorntail repo for better release management. However, Teiid Thorntail would need a new home. > Most notable breaking change will be, the package names will change from that of Thorntail. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5537) Move Thorntail examples to use new modules

by Ramesh Reddy (Jira)

Ramesh Reddy created TEIID-5537: ----------------------------------- Summary: Move Thorntail examples to use new modules Key: TEIID-5537 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5537 Project: Teiid Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Ramesh Reddy Assignee: Steven Hawkins Also, how about closing the "thorntail-examples" repo and merging the examples with the new Thontail repo? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5536) Create separate repository for Thorntail modules

by Ramesh Reddy (Jira)

Ramesh Reddy created TEIID-5536: ----------------------------------- Summary: Create separate repository for Thorntail modules Key: TEIID-5536 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5536 Project: Teiid Issue Type: Task Reporter: Ramesh Reddy Assignee: Steven Hawkins THORN-2232 Removes the Teiid modules from the core Thorntail repo for better release management. However, Teiid Thorntail would need a new home. Most notable breaking change will be, the package names will change from that of Thorntail. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5535) CTE: Inconsistent Error Message when SELECTing a View Instead of its Definition

by Steven Hawkins (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Steven Hawkins resolved TEIID-5535. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Duplicate Issue Duplicate of TEIID-5532 - I had just reopened that issue to cover the view case as well. > CTE: Inconsistent Error Message when SELECTing a View Instead of its Definition > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TEIID-5535 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5535 > Project: Teiid > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Query Engine > Affects Versions: 11.1 > Environment: teiid-11.1.0 (from 01.09.2018) on WildFly Full 11.0.0.Final (WildFly Core 3.0.8.Final) > Reporter: dalex dalex > Assignee: Steven Hawkins > Priority: Critical > > There are queries involving CTEs and set operators that can be executed and return results. > However, creating a view based on the working queries makes these views unusable as they return an error message. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

5 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

teiid-issues November 2018