Re: [aerogear-dev] message format change proposal

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: > 'payload' is the term used for this kind of "in-message custom data" > since the early years of EIP tools (before camel was born) > nested payload, inside of message, I am not sure Thinking a bit more about it, I don’t like data (it’s to generic everything is data) and I don’t like payload either (because everything is message payload)

can’t we use something like ‘customData’ , ‘userData’, `userKeys` or perhaps something that says a little bit more to what this is.

> > Any strong reason to avoid it? > yeah, let’s keep the once that are there because the are consistent with apple _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev