Clear. Thanks for the patience!
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:23:23 -0300
Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
Karel Piwko wrote:
> Not really. Let me rephrase. Previously, there were two branches for
> Aerogear Security, 1.1.x and 1.2.x,
Is not that true, the branch 1.2.x doesn't exist
(
http://photon.abstractj.org/aerogearaerogearsecurity_20130812_070155.jpg)
according to your email 1.1.x existed due to
> incompatibility with Unified Push Server.
1.1.x was created because PicketLink beta6 had a ton of changes and
would break the API existent into Unified Push server. Our schedule was
too tight for webinar, so the change wouldn't be a good idea.
>
> I was asking whether 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT solves that
1.2.1 release solves critical security issues founded into PicketLink
beta5 / beta6
, that is could I use
> Aerogear Security 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT with Unified Push Server right now
Yes ->
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unified-push-server/pull/72
(already fixed the issue reported by Matthias)
, or there
> is a work needed on Push to make it work with 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT or even
> whether you plan to continue with Aerogear Security 1.1.x series for that
> reason.
>
No work is needed.
> Makes sense now?
Clear now? Let me know.