Not that you asked me but :-)
+1 on the horizontal "dashboard" section
+1 to the concern related to "status" - the first time I saw it I felt it only
addressed errors - not all possible but recent "activity"
I think the word "Log" or "Activity" would be better
On May 21, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Hylke,
any comments on Matt's reply?
Or is this the final draft:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/Unified%20...
-Matthias
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Matt Carrano <mcarrano(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hey Hylke,
This is looking good. I had a few minor comments/questions about the layout and labeling.
Take a look at the marked up wireframe (attached).
-Matt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hylke Bons" <hbons(a)redhat.com>
To: aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Cc: "Matt Carrano" <mcarrano(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 8:03:13 AM
Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] First go at stats/activity wireframes
Hello,
Here are some updates based on the feedback from the meetings:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/Unified%20...
- Simplified dashboard stats
- Apps notifications table
- Defined entry points
Let me know what you think. I hope that covers everything.
Thanks,
Hylke
On 15/05/2014 16:19, Hylke Bons wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Here's an initial version:
>
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/Unified%20...
>
> I tried to incorporate most wishes expressed in the other thread.
>
> Most notable things:
> - Landing page with an overview of stats, most active apps, and error
> messages
> - Activity table shows both registration and notification events
> - Activity table is per variant, and not all activity on the server.
> Unless there's a usecase to have every event for every app/variant in a
> table I don't think we actually need it. The important thing is to get
> to error messages easily.
>
> Things to do/think about:
> - links/entry points to the activity table
> - filtering the activity table
>
> This is just the first iteration and we will improve on this.
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hylke
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev