Basically it is something that we "agreed on" (or rather didn't catch)
during mockup reviews and that never changed from that time.
@Andres: did it have some reason to hide the details?
I'm all for exposing it more visibly.
st 24. 6. 2015 v 17:21 odesílatel Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
napsal:
Hi,
on our old design the PushApplicationID/MasterSecret was very good to
notice:
https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_var...
Now it's a bit more hidden (one has to click on the "Sender API" tab of
the Application).
Similar w/ the VariantID/Secret pair, IMO it is also a bit hidden, since
this is only visible in the source snippets for the variant.
They used to be a bit more present:
https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_var...
Since I find that suboptimal, I am wondering if that's done for a good
reason, or if something (in a future version?) should be changed ?
-M
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev