7:13 a.m.
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:40:34 +0200
Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Karel Piwko
<kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> +1 for not having -stable branch
>
> +1 for doing version bumps, especially if semantically similar to
>
> ...
> 1.2.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT
> (bump) 1.2.0.Alpha1
> 1.2.0.Beta1-SNAPSHOT
> (bump) 1.2.0.Beta1
> 1.2.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT
> (ups, bump quickfix) 1.2.0.Beta2
> 1.2.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT
>
there will be NO Alpha, BETA, CR, WHAT_NOT :)
we just use numbers.
haven't said that WHAT_EVER (except -SNAPSHOT) is necessary :-)
-SNAPSHOT is actually not necessary neither, but provides some free goodies in
Maven world.
> ...
>
> +1 on further discussion ;-)
>
> Karel
>
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:51:01 -0500
> Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > OK, for the sake of peace I will concede to no stable branch so that we
> can
> > move on. If it doesn't work well we can always change it.
> >
> > Everyone else please voice your opinions still so we can get agreement on
> > this. We don't all have to agree which is why we discuss. :)
> >
> > On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me>
wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:56:53PM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
> > >> > So we haven't talked about this for a while so I thought I
would
> stir
> > >> > the fire again. Does anyone have any objection to JS managing
our
> > >> > versions as such:
> > >> >
> > >> > I would like to move what is currently in master to a 1-0-stable
> branch
> > >> > Then I would like to update master's build version to
1.1.0-pre
> > >> > All work is done on the master branch then if the change is
> applicable
> > >> > to 1.0.0, it can be cherry-picked into the 1-0-stable branch
> > >> My take on this:
> > >>
> > >> -1 for the stable label - if people want stable, they want releases
> > >>
> > >> I do not like -stable as well. And yes. the _final_ TAG is the
> release. I
> > >> do agree here!
> > >
> > > Can you, and everyone else be more specific here. Do you not like the
> > > label, or the whole idea of a stable branch?
> > >
> > > Not liking "stable branch". For me that is a TAG (immutable).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> +1 for the version bump - java(ish) projects already does this via
> > >> maven-release-plugin (1.1.0-SNAPSHOT) - but I think -pre isn't
clear
> as
> > >> -dev is (we use .dev on jruby)
> > >>
> > >> I don't have strong feelings for -dev -snapshot, or what ever
:-)
> > >>
> > >> IMO both, for example, -dev or -snapshot, make it clear: current dev
> is
> > >> here.
> > >>
> > >> So, I am happy with -dev or -snapshot (or -pre) :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> qmx
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Matthias Wessendorf
> > >>
> > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>