On 01/21/2015 10:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
I think the problem that I have with using Arquillian is the time of
execution for these integration tests. It boots up a container and
stuff and just makes the test execution take a very long time. We
spoke about that in the past, and didn't do Aquillian due to that.
I'm
learning to alike Arquillian. Would it be terribly to put the Arq
tests in a profile so they only get run if you pass -Pit or something?
Eventually the tests may get to take long enough its important.
The android-maven-plugin does that so you aren't always firing up
Android VM's.
Not sure how others feel about it, but I'd prefer we dont boot a
container inside our tests
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com
<mailto:edewit@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
The database unit tests of the UPS contain a lot of setup code as
setting up the database is done within the test method. I’m
proposing to remove this ‘noise’ from the test and put it in a
separate file. Another thing that is setting up the dao's, when we
use arquillian weld container we can use injection in our tests to
further reduce the boilerplate, have a look at an example:
https://github.com/edewit/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/4bb63adce319df...
If you like I could do this for all these tests.
Cheers,
Erik Jan
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Summers Pittman
>Phone:404 941 4698
>Java is my crack.