Re: [aerogear-dev] DataSync or SyncPipe API proposal

On Feb 10, 2014, at 6:38 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hello Guys, > > Following discussion on ML thread [1], and JIRA discussion [2] (sorry guys I catched up the discussion late, I wasn’t watching the JIRa ticket so i didn’t get notifications) here is the 2 gists we have: > 1. DataSync (JS naming) [3] > 2. SyncPipe(ios naming) [4] > > I guess we should call them the same and agree on a name. I like to use ‘pipe’ in the naming just to recall it’s async and going through network. I found DataSync a too generic term which may lead to confusion. This is not the same object that will save data offline and trigger sync. > > Main differences are: in iOS one I defined a readAll method. Also for save/update I define a third callbacks ‘conflict’ which take 3 arguments . in JS the read method can also be "read all", should probably update that gist > > @summers do you have a gist for java API? > thoughts? > > ++ > Corinne > [1] http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-sync-To-pipe-or-no... > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1408 > [3] https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/81de9737b5c91367aa3c > [4] https://gist.github.com/corinnekrych/8914290 > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev