do it
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
+1
On Apr 15, 2015 3:38 AM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3.
>
> Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch.
>
> That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can
> branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this
> branch..
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev