Re: [aerogear-dev] Advanced Analtyics, new PR and call to the client tech leads

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> To give a bit of background on this background to foreground issue :)) >>> >>> Push Cordova plugin matches Cordova life cycle by storing some >>> information locally see: >>> >>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-cordova-push/blob/master/src/ios/AGP... >>> Doing so allows you to call multiple time registration, even when an >>> app comes back from background to foreground. you can do it because you >>> have stored locally all the information neede for registration. >>> >>> But when dealing directly with native apps, the life cycle does not >>> always goes through a registration. >>> >>> To sort out this issue,we can: >>> - either store locally at the ios-push lib level instead of doing it in >>> Cordova plugin and then call registration API on all delegate methods (even >>> though we don't want to register but just send the metrics) >>> - or leave the ios-push lib without any storage and provide a separate >>> endpoint for sending metrics or changing categories. >>> >>> I'd go for the second option. >>> >>> second option makes sense +1 >> > > +1 on separate endpoint for metrics collection > > regarding changing categories: Do you mean a new method on the client > SDK, performing a PUT, containing the new categories for the device token, > to the existing endpoint (but using PUT), instead of getting a > /updateInstallation endpoint? > Adding a separate method on Android seems kind of weird. Android is rather spammy (intentionally and by design and according to big papa G's best practices) with the registration call. Basically best practice on Android is call registration every time the application is opened.

> > >> >> - >> Christos >> >>> >>> >>> On 5 May 2015 at 10:39, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> I agree with this and maybe we want even more functionality moved, >>>> because also updating the categories is strange in a 'register' >>>> method. Say for instance you want to change the categories your >>>> interested in a developer has to call register again? And if I >>>> understand Corinnes mail that will currently not even work on iOS. >>>> >>>> For cordova I store the device info, because the lifecycle is >>>> different, but that is okay it's an integration problem. >>>> >>>> So updating the installation details should be a separate method that >>>> also contains updating the categories. That way we have a better split >>>> between a device that registers itself with UPS and updating the >>>> subscription data. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> > Hello Sebi, >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > I've done an initial work on aerogear-ios-push [swift branch], >>>> adding a new >>>> > parameter when doing the registration to pass the ag-push-id. See: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-push/compare/aerogear:master...c... >>>> > >>>> > This client could be tested with HelloWorld. See: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/jboss-mobile/unified-push-helloworld/compare/jboss-mob... >>>> > >>>> > What is not covered is the background app coming to foreground >>>> through a >>>> > push notification. If you look at HelloWorld: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/jboss-mobile/unified-push-helloworld/blob/f7d0a7e09332... >>>> > >>>> > In iOS, when we go from background to foreground we don't go through >>>> > registration API. The iOS push lib doesn't store locally (as opposed >>>> to >>>> > windows sdk for ex) the device information. So i can't really make >>>> another >>>> > call to registration API. What i'd suggest is to have a separate >>>> endpoint >>>> > for metrics instead of having it coupled with registration endpoint. >>>> wdyt? >>>> > >>>> > ++ >>>> > >>>> > Corinne >>>> > >>>> > On 4 May 2015 at 19:07, Sébastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Hi Corinne ! >>>> >> We want to collect for both situations you described :) >>>> >> >>>> >> Envoyé de mon iPhone >>>> >> >>>> >> Le 4 mai 2015 à 17:53, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; a >>>> écrit : >>>> >> >>>> >> Hello Sebi, >>>> >> >>>> >> After giving it a closer look, I've got a question for you: do we >>>> want to >>>> >> collect metrics only when an app is opened via push notification or >>>> do we >>>> >> also want to collect metrics when an app is brought to foreground >>>> by a push >>>> >> notification? >>>> >> >>>> >> ++ >>>> >> Corinne >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On 4 May 2015 at 10:21, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Yeap >>>> >>> on it. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On 30 April 2015 at 15:43, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The Advanced Analytics task[1] has a new PR[2] that has been >>>> rebased on >>>> >>>> the latest master and got a lot of polishing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Could the Client Tech Leads take a look at it [3] and review ? >>>> The only >>>> >>>> "breaking" change is the rename of the header's name that >>>> identifies a Push >>>> >>>> Notification, it's called now "aerogear-push-id" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Seb >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-971 >>>> >>>> [2] >>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/540 >>>> >>>> [3] Subtasks of https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-971 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cheers, >>>> Erik Jan >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev