Re: [aerogear-dev] JDK9 / UPS

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:07 PM, David Martin <davmarti(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hey Matthias, > > What are you thinking for a more modular UPS? > Do you mean modular inside the ups code, or modular jars or eaps that > come together to make up a ups? > ultimately yes: a collection of JARs (containing WF-Swarm), that make the UPS. Modular here, w/ Java9 can even lead to a more optimized RT - containing only what's really needed. https://github.com/moditect/moditect#creating-modular-runtime-images not exactly sure how well this fits WF-Swarm and the MCS (Jboss modules) underneath > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:01 Matthias Wessendorf, <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > >> btw. the JDK_9 branch is here: >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/JDK_9 >> >> At this time, it's still targeting 1.8 - but the coming profile will >> change that, so we have both 1.8 _and_ 1.9 (similar to other middleware >> projects) >> >> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've released a first version (from a branch) of the parent 2.0.0 - the >>> 1.1.x stuff stays on master for now. >>> >>> release branch: >>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-parent/tree/2.0.0 >>> >>> This POM will be used for UPS JDK_9 development. As of today the UPS >>> builds fine w/ Java9, when skipping tests :-) >>> >>> Part of the problem is some of the modular system, coming w/ JDK9. >>> >>> Current thinking is to introduce an additional JDK9 profile, with >>> proper dependencies and plugin configurations (e.g. --add-modules enabled >>> for certain plugins) only when running on java9. >>> >>> I am not 100% sure at this moment, but I guess this might force us to >>> also update some APIs (e.g. JPA/Transactions from 2.0 to latest). >>> Generally this aligns well with our community goals, to support latest of >>> WildFly (e.g. 11+). This is something I am going to investigate the next >>> days. >>> >>> Hope is, to fully support java9, and trying to turn UPS into a more >>> modular system, likely based on WF-Swarm, but that's really sure, for now. >>> >>> Any thoughts / comments / feedback ? >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> github: https://github.com/matzew >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> github: https://github.com/matzew >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Aerogear" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to aerogear+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to aerogear(a)googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms >> gid/aerogear/CAAg5f2TF3sDcmofMeBQDv3gUg8DSWkOwuvuYv6g9SsPE7s >> A3hQ%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/aerogear/CAAg5f2TF3sDcmofMeBQDv3gUg8DSW... >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Aerogear" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to aerogear+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to aerogear(a)googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms > gid/aerogear/CADvBQ44vHnzqWd__dHrb99jo%2BZFMTKTA% > 2BqLrbsCr4OggSjo8_w%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/aerogear/CADvBQ44vHnzqWd__dHrb99jo%2BZF... > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Matthias Wessendorf github: https://github.com/matzew twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf