4:13 a.m.
Hi Daniel,
I like the idea (I think this is how the docs organization should be
driven), how about:
As a developer or contributor, I'd like to know what repos are
associated with the feature/platform I'm planning to develop for.
I think this was the original intention behind the 'Modules' pulldown on
aerogear.org which, for example, links to https://aerogear.org/sync/.
Unfortunately, the repos <https://github.com/aerogear/?query=sync> link
doesn't work as expected for me. (and I'm not sure if changing the link
to https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aaerogear+sync is a good solution)
As I've said earlier [1], I find aerogear.org difficult to maintain
(it's now a mishmash of html/markdown/asciidoc, with dependencies I seem
to have difficulty following [2].
If there isn't an appetite for changing to asciibinder, I can still help
reorganize, update and publish documentation, and this seems as good an
issue as any to start with. How about doing this collation on the wiki
(using asciidoc):
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/wiki
WDYT?
Paul
[1]
https://www.redhat.com/archives/feedhenry-dev/2017-December/msg00091.html
[2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/pull/714
On 01/02/2018 10:08 PM, Daniel Passos wrote:
I was thinking about have a project to group the repos with the same
feature/platform, but that is not the GH idea.
I thought project will give us something like
https://github.com/aerogear/projects/sync and this link will list all
sync repos
As I sad, nevermind!
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Wei Li <weil(a)redhat.com
<mailto:weil@redhat.com>> wrote:
You can have GH project per org -
https://github.com/orgs/aerogear/projects
<https://github.com/orgs/aerogear/projects>;. But I don't know why
we need it given that we already have Trello & Jira?
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com
<mailto:dpassos@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi Paul,
Nevermind,
I'd like to create a project to group repos, like:
Project X
aerogear-android-x
aerogear-ios-x
But, GH do it in a different way. Just realized GH project is
per repo not per org
My mistake. Sorry about that.
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Paul Wright
<pwright(a)redhat.com <mailto:pwright@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
can you outline why you think it will help?
If there are projects for all platforms and features,
won't we end up wrangling projects as well as repos?
Note: I'm saying this with true ignorance, I have no idea
whether that's true or not ;)
Paul
On 01/02/2018 05:16 PM, Daniel Passos wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I wanna create some Github projects to help us to
> organize repos on AeroGear organization. Wdyt?
>
> I was thinking about create 2 types of projects:
>
> 1. Platforms
> 2. Features
>
> Some examples in my mind:
>
>
> Platforms
>
> Android
> iOS
> JS
> Xamarin
> Cordova
>
>
> Feature
>
> Website
> Core
> Http
> Push
> OAuth2
> Database
> Security
> Sync
>
> PS: A repo can be in more than one project.
>
>
> --
> -- Passos
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> feedhenry-dev mailing list
> feedhenry-dev(a)redhat.com <mailto:feedhenry-dev@redhat.com>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
> <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev>
--
Paul Wright
Mobile Docs (github: finp)
--
-- Passos
_______________________________________________
feedhenry-dev mailing list
feedhenry-dev(a)redhat.com <mailto:feedhenry-dev@redhat.com>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev
<https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev>
--
WEI LI
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER
Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/>
weil(a)redhat.com <mailto:weil@redhat.com> M: +353862393272
<tel:+353862393272>
<https://red.ht/sig>
--
-- Passos
--
Paul Wright
Mobile Docs (github: finp)