Re: [aerogear-dev] iOS integration test update [timeout,cancel]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: I'm not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, I like the idea of some server app somewhere that I can do my integration tests against since having someone contributing to JS deploy a server themselves to be able to run or add to integration tests is a blocker. On the other hand, this is another piece for us to maintain. yes - tests need to be maintained :)

On Feb 25, 2013, at 4:27 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > for testing of timeout[1] and cancel[2], apart from the unit tests (that used a mocked http), I have updated our iOS integration tests to go against a simple server app[3] that does a "sleep" on the requests methods so I can properly verify the methods do work [both in iOS 5/6]. > > Because as I understand, the "sleep" simulation applies to other platforms too, what should we do for this case? Have a branch on the "TODO" app eg. "TODO-integration" that will be used in our integration tests, or have a different server application for that purpose. > > wdyt? > > Thanks, > Christos > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-931 > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-898 > [3] https://github.com/cvasilak/RESTfulExample > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev