Re: [aerogear-dev] thoughts on merging docs repo on site repo

+1 for merge - the original idea was sound, but the integration is too difficult. As I mentioned I would want to revisit this in the future. On Sep 5, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Kris Borchers wrote: > +1 for merge > > On Sep 5, 2012, at 5:50 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: > >> Howdy >> >> I was thinking we should reconsider if it's really paying off to have the two repos separated - right now it's bringing more problems than solving IMO. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -- qmx >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev