On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Daniel Bevenius <
daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, something needs to be done about this. Either moving it out, or
> having it only enabled with a profile (Summers mentioned this yesterday).
>
-1 on profile.
IMO the goal is to create a sync client lib, similar to iOS (which is also
on its own repo), so that should not be included on the java server.
Eventually we should move out the JS bits as well
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1562
For the JS part I am not sure what's the best way, since it's not just
library, it's also demo
>
>
> On 16 January 2015 at 15:01, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> should we move the Android client-xmpp to its own repo? Right now, when
>> building the server (and with an incomplete Android setup (aka new, clean
>> repo)) you have to comment it out in order to build the server for running
>> the JS demo.
>>
>> IMO it would be nice if that gets moved out to something like
>> "aerogear-android-xmpp-client".
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf