It might be worth to suggest that to the Ansible Service Broker team. A workaround could be to add the version to the description in apb.yml ( https://github.com/aerogearcatalog/keycloak-apb/blob/master/apb.yml#L3). Am 24.01.2018 um 11:29 schrieb Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo < jgallaso(a)redhat.com&gt;: Hi, I think it would be useful to somehow see the version of the APBs from the catalog. Somewhere in this screen maybe: <Screen Shot 2018-01-24 at 11.19.11.png> It is very annoying to deploy the whole thing just to see that I don't have the APB I expected. What do you think? JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO ASSOCIATE QE, mobile Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig>

version information would very useful I agree. It is likely something we could define in the metadata for the apb.yaml but to display it, rather than the asb team, I think we would want to add an issue to the https://github.com/openshift/origin-web-catalog On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Peter Braun <pbraun(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > It might be worth to suggest that to the Ansible Service Broker team. A > workaround could be to add the version to the description in apb.yml ( > https://github.com/aerogearcatalog/keycloak-apb/blob/master/apb.yml#L3). > > Am 24.01.2018 um 11:29 schrieb Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo < > jgallaso(a)redhat.com&gt;: > > Hi, > > I think it would be useful to somehow see the version of the APBs from > the catalog. Somewhere in this screen maybe: > > <Screen Shot 2018-01-24 at 11.19.11.png> > > It is very annoying to deploy the whole thing just to see that I don't > have the APB I expected. > > What do you think? > > JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO > > ASSOCIATE QE, mobile > Red Hat > > <https://www.redhat.com/> > > M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > > -- Craig Brookes RHMAP @maleck13 Github

Yes I think that is a good idea. More so stating what you want and why and then they will reply to it and it will go from there On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo < jgallaso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > @Craig shall I file an issue there asking for that change? > > JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO > > ASSOCIATE QE, mobile > > Red Hat > > <https://www.redhat.com/> > > M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > On 24 January 2018 at 12:18, Craig Brookes <cbrookes(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> version information would very useful I agree. It is likely something we >> could define in the metadata for the apb.yaml but to display it, rather >> than the asb team, I think we would want to add an issue to the >> https://github.com/openshift/origin-web-catalog >> >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Peter Braun <pbraun(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> It might be worth to suggest that to the Ansible Service Broker team. A >>> workaround could be to add the version to the description in apb.yml ( >>> https://github.com/aerogearcatalog/keycloak-apb/blob/master/apb.yml#L3 >>> ). >>> >>> Am 24.01.2018 um 11:29 schrieb Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo < >>> jgallaso(a)redhat.com&gt;: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think it would be useful to somehow see the version of the APBs from >>> the catalog. Somewhere in this screen maybe: >>> >>> <Screen Shot 2018-01-24 at 11.19.11.png> >>> >>> It is very annoying to deploy the whole thing just to see that I don't >>> have the APB I expected. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO >>> >>> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile >>> Red Hat >>> >>> <https://www.redhat.com/> >>> >>> M: +34618488633 >>> <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> >>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Craig Brookes >> RHMAP >> @maleck13 Github >> > > -- Craig Brookes RHMAP @maleck13 Github _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Filed the issue here: https://github.com/openshift/origin-web-catalog/ issues/624 Upvote and comment please! PS: I removed mobile-dev from te CC list JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO ASSOCIATE QE, mobile Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> On 24 January 2018 at 14:01, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Craig Brookes <cbrookes(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Yes I think that is a good idea. More so stating what you want and why >> and then they will reply to it and it will go from there >> >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo < >> jgallaso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> @Craig shall I file an issue there asking for that change? >>> >>> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO >>> >>> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile >>> >>> Red Hat >>> >>> <https://www.redhat.com/> >>> >>> M: +34618488633 >>> <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> >>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>> >>> On 24 January 2018 at 12:18, Craig Brookes <cbrookes(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> version information would very useful I agree. It is likely something >>>> we could define in the metadata for the apb.yaml but to display it, rather >>>> than the asb team, I think we would want to add an issue to the >>>> https://github.com/openshift/origin-web-catalog >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Peter Braun <pbraun(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It might be worth to suggest that to the Ansible Service Broker team. >>>>> A workaround could be to add the version to the description in apb.yml ( >>>>> https://github.com/aerogearcatalog/keycloak-apb/blob/master >>>>> /apb.yml#L3). >>>>> >>>>> Am 24.01.2018 um 11:29 schrieb Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo < >>>>> jgallaso(a)redhat.com&gt;: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be useful to somehow see the version of the APBs >>>>> from the catalog. Somewhere in this screen maybe: >>>>> >>>>> <Screen Shot 2018-01-24 at 11.19.11.png> >>>>> >>>>> It is very annoying to deploy the whole thing just to see that I >>>>> don't have the APB I expected. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO >>>>> >>>>> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile >>>>> Red Hat >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>> >>>>> M: +34618488633 >>>>> <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> >>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Craig Brookes >>>> RHMAP >>>> @maleck13 Github >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Craig Brookes >> RHMAP >> @maleck13 Github >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > github: https://github.com/matzew > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >

actually - I just posted online :) hehe On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > done > > I generally find it also nasty that, if you build an _existing_ apb > locally and directly push it, that it shows up twice. > > sure one comes from the dh org that is configured (e.g. aerogearcatalog), > and the one that's new comes from the local registry, pretty hard to > determine which is what :) > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo < > jgallaso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> Filed the issue here: https://github.com/opens >> hift/origin-web-catalog/issues/624 >> >> Upvote and comment please! >> >> PS: I removed mobile-dev from te CC list >> >> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO >> >> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile >> >> Red Hat >> >> <https://www.redhat.com/> >> >> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> >> >> <https://red.ht/sig> >> >> On 24 January 2018 at 14:01, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Craig Brookes <cbrookes(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes I think that is a good idea. More so stating what you want and why >>>> and then they will reply to it and it will go from there >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo < >>>> jgallaso(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> @Craig shall I file an issue there asking for that change? >>>>> >>>>> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO >>>>> >>>>> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile >>>>> >>>>> Red Hat >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>> >>>>> M: +34618488633 >>>>> <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> >>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>> >>>>> On 24 January 2018 at 12:18, Craig Brookes <cbrookes(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> version information would very useful I agree. It is likely >>>>>> something we could define in the metadata for the apb.yaml but to display >>>>>> it, rather than the asb team, I think we would want to add an issue to the >>>>>> https://github.com/openshift/origin-web-catalog >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Peter Braun <pbraun(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It might be worth to suggest that to the Ansible Service Broker >>>>>>> team. A workaround could be to add the version to the description in >>>>>>> apb.yml (https://github.com/aerogearca >>>>>>> talog/keycloak-apb/blob/master/apb.yml#L3). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 24.01.2018 um 11:29 schrieb Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo < >>>>>>> jgallaso(a)redhat.com&gt;: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it would be useful to somehow see the version of the APBs >>>>>>> from the catalog. Somewhere in this screen maybe: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <Screen Shot 2018-01-24 at 11.19.11.png> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is very annoying to deploy the whole thing just to see that I >>>>>>> don't have the APB I expected. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile >>>>>>> Red Hat >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> M: +34618488633 >>>>>>> <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/> >>>>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Craig Brookes >>>>>> RHMAP >>>>>> @maleck13 Github >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Craig Brookes >>>> RHMAP >>>> @maleck13 Github >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> github: https://github.com/matzew >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > github: https://github.com/matzew > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf github: https://github.com/matzew twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf