Pending -> might be a UI glitch - not 100% sure
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
jgallaso(a)redhat.com> wrote:
All right, I didn't have the mock server up, which makes me feel
yet more
confused. I have realised it today 'cause I got a "Failed" after sending a
notification, however yesterday I got only "Pending".. why? It looks like
it shows "Pending" when sending to multiple variants but when it is only
one, the status is "Failed".
On 25 January 2017 at 19:29, Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> the mock backend needs to have a response, that google's FCM lib (which
> is used in UPS), needs to understand. Otherwise, well ... sure, no luck.
>
> In case you are using wiremock, please do something like:
>
> curl -X POST --data '{ "request": { "url":
"/fcm/send", "method": "POST" }, "response": {
"status": 200, "fixedDelayMilliseconds": 2000, "jsonBody":
{"multicast_id": 108,"success": 1,"failure":
0,"canonical_ids": 0,"results": [{ "message_id":
"1:08"}]}, "headers": {"Content-Type":
"application/json"}}}'
http://localhost:9090/__admin/mappings/new
>
> so that the loclahost:3000/fcm/send thing sends a meaningful response.
>
> -Matthias
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
> jgallaso(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> No, it just sends "null". But that does not seem to be an issue for
the
>> first app :/
>>
>> On 25 January 2017 at 15:56, Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> and the tool that intercepts the requests also sends back some meaning
>>> full reponse ?
>>>
>>> like described here:
>>>
https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/send-messag
>>> e#http_response
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
>>> jgallaso(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, the proxy is up and the -Dcustom.aerogear.fcm.push.host is set,
>>>> the notifications are actually being sent.
>>>>
>>>> On 25 January 2017 at 15:44, Matthias Wessendorf
<mwessend(a)redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> endpoints for thje /fcm/send mock are setup ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
>>>>> jgallaso(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <jgallaso(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> Date: 25 January 2017 at 13:00
>>>>>> Subject: Mysterious warning when sending push
>>>>>> To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List
<aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have some phenomenon here. I have created 4 variants with 100
fake
>>>>>> tokens and sending 1 push through the mock FCM server. What I got
is 400
>>>>>> (401 to be exact) receivers so it seems to work OK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These are the 4 variants (the order is important):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However ONLY on 2nd to 4nd variant I got this warning:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first variant in the list is not getting the error. I
created
>>>>>> them in order (0 - 3) so this does not matter because the 0
(second in the
>>>>>> list) is receiving the warning but the 1 (first in the list) is
not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look what happens if I delete the first variant in the list and
>>>>>> send another notification:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Now the first in the list is variant 0, the former 2nd in the
list)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is no longer receiving the warning!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the log from the console:
>>>>>>
https://gist.github.com/josemigallas/69db6619a46bafafc9ae028
>>>>>> a29b343f7
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what do you think? Bug? It does not seem to be related with
the
>>>>>> fact that I am using the FCM proxy... or does it? Maybe I'm
missing
>>>>>> something obvious.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo*
>>>>>> Associate QE at Mobile Team, *Red Hat*
>>>>>>
<
https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/mobile/application-platform>
>>>>>> +34 618 488 633 <+34%20618%2048%2086%2033>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo*
>>>>>> Associate QE at Mobile Team, *Red Hat*
>>>>>>
<
https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/mobile/application-platform>
>>>>>> +34 618 488 633 <+34%20618%2048%2086%2033>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Project lead
AeroGear.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo*
>>>> Associate QE at Mobile Team, *Red Hat*
>>>>
<
https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/mobile/application-platform>
>>>> +34 618 488 633 <+34%20618%2048%2086%2033>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Project lead
AeroGear.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo*
>> Associate QE at Mobile Team, *Red Hat*
>> <
https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/mobile/application-platform>
>> +34 618 488 633 <+34%20618%2048%2086%2033>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Project lead
AeroGear.org
>
--
*Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo*
Associate QE at Mobile Team, *Red Hat*
<
https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/mobile/application-platform>
+34 618 488 633 <+34%20618%2048%2086%2033>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev