I think the original order came from the fact that the JS bits were the first to be
released. I think listing in alpha order makes sense.
On Aug 13, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
Well, IMO iOS should go to the end of the list because it sucks,
just
kidding.
Agreed about ordering by alphabet.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering about something...
>
> the list:
> * iOS
> * Android
> * Web
> * Hybrid
>
> Not sure, but I *think* some folks may (want) to read that iOS has
> higher prio over Android, Android over JS/Web etc....
>
> I tend to list by alphabet to avoid those 'discussions' :-)
>
> So my 'politically correct' list would be like:
> * Android
> * Hybrid
> * iOS
> * Web
>
>
> does that make sense - or should we not even worry about those incorrect
> 'misinterpretations' ?
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev