This all sounds really good to me! The priority would be wf/eap imo, with
others if very easy, or if community members want to jump in and add their
favorite.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> Cool stuff
>
> I am totally fine having this tied ti wf/eap
>
> wondering: at some point, should we offer a dist as (only) subststem for
> wf/eap?
>
+1, I was exactly thinking the same, since we are tied to wf/eap,
subsystem makes a lot of sense IMO
>
>
> On Friday, April 3, 2015, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That all sounds very good :)
>> Thanks for the headupate, I will soon give it a try.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> so as outlined in previous thread [1], I have prototyped a JMS batching
>>> approach for push message delivery.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We've discussed the approach with Matthias, Mirek Novak and Ondrej
>>> Chaloupka (EAP QE & JMS/JTA experts, thank you guys!) and these
documents
>>> describes a concept that we have came with:
>>>
>>> Diagram:
>>>
https://docs.google.com/a/fryc.eu/drawings/d/13IsJWPSJNYXtst-UVxQYmzH36C_...
>>>
>>> Text Doc:
>>>
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X65P_U9O62Z5JZhKi9ZvBuZU1OrL4pNHNddlz...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Implementation-wise, I've so far prototyped the messaging part (split
>>> SenderService functionality to two subsequent queues with MDBs as shown on
>>> diagram),
>>>
>>> but that's just a start, since we must configure it appropriately for
>>> efficiency (queue configuration and batch sizes) and verify that
>>> configuration works as expected,
>>>
>>> the prototype lives on a branch (unpolished, to be squashed later):
>>>
https://github.com/lfryc/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/jms-batching
>>>
>>> Off course, you can play with it already. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Apart from the new requirement of using Java EE full profile (JMS), the
>>> prototype leverages implementation-specific configurations and APIs:
>>>
>>> - org.hibernate.Query for token streaming / batch fetching
>>> - HornetQ configurations of queue size, blocking behavior and
>>> message de-duplication
>>>
>>> That pretty much binds us to WildFly/EAP - we can tweak it to run on
>>> any compliant app server, but without specific configurations it won't
work
>>> properly.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Once configured and functionally tested (that can even wait for Beta2 I
>>> guess),
>>>
>>> we can cooperate with Mobile QE on testing (Stefan, Adam), their test
>>> suite contains mocks of APNS/GCM against which we can load test.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>> ~ Lukas
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-UnifiedPush-new-re...
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev