Re: [aerogear-dev] Unified Push Server user management questions
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 28/06/2013 11:52, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Thanks. So what's the use case for this? Why would you not want to not
> use push networks specified for the main app? Also, how common is this?
>
in apple, every app id (== variant) needs it's OWN certificate.
That's why it is modeled that way
This only applies to Apple APNs? I'd say if there isn't a technical reason
why you'd want to this for the other networks we leave it out for those.
In Google you would use different API keys - in SimplePush it could be a
different cloud provider etc
Not sure why this would be a problem
Thanks,
Hylke
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.7 KB)