On Friday, September 19, 2014 1:50:33 PM, Daniel Passos wrote:
Summers you're never wrong :)
BTW, I'm not sure about 2.0 or 2.1, we are in the middle of a BIG
refactoring for 2.0
Can we make a areogear-android-datasync:0.1 then?
-- Passos
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com
<mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 9/19/2014 7:25 AM, Lukáš Fryč wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> on yesterday's Aerogear.js meeting we have discussed in which
> version we should include Data Sync module. Since we are starting
> works on ES6 compatibility, which is one of the big features for
> 2.0, it make sense to continue with Data Sync there.
>
> What about Android and iOS SDKs? Do you plan to include new
> module in 2.0 or start that in 1.x and later backport to 2.0?
It will be part of 2.0. We don't have any plans to back port this
to the 1.x branches of things.
Passos, feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
>
>
> Cheers!
>
> ~ Lukas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev